From: A simple consensus approach improves somatic mutation prediction accuracy
 | MJS | MJ | MS | JS | M | J | S | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All SNVs predicted, n (% of all variants)b | 1,483 (16.1%) | 83 (0.9%) | 462 (5.0%) | 298 (3.2%) | 1,756 (19.0%) | 2,387 (25.9%) | 2,757 (29.9%) | 9,226 |
SNVs suitable for validation (% of all SNVs suitable for validation)c | 1385 (54.4%) | 16 (0.6%) | 370 (14.5%) | 57 (2.2%) | 279 (11.0%) | 80 (3.1%) | 360 (14.1%) | 2,547 |
Average number (range) of filtered SNVs per sample | 51.3 | 0.6 | 13.7 | 2.1 | 10.3 | 3.0 | 13.3 | 94.3 |
(1 to 246) | (0 to 6) | (5 to 42) | (0 to 11) | (3 to 33) | (0 to 23) | (5 to 25) | (38 to 321) | |
Number (%) of SNVs that could not be used for validation | 98 (6.6%) | 67 (80.7%) | 92 (19.9%) | 241 (80.9%) | 1477 (84.1%) | 2307 (96.6%) | 2397 (86.9%) | 6679 (86.9%) |