Skip to main content

Table 3 Degree of agreement/disagreement on perceived utility and general attitudes regarding genome sequencing

From: Predispositional genome sequencing in healthy adults: design, participant characteristics, and early outcomes of the PeopleSeq Consortium

 

No. (%)a

Strongly disagree

Somewhat disagree

Neither agree nor disagree

Somewhat agree

Strongly agree

Perceived utility of genome sequencing

 I learned something to improve my health that I did not know before

70 (14.6)

86 (18.0)

133 (27.8)

105 (22.0)

84 (17.6)

 Having personal genome sequencing made me feel like I have more control over my health

42 (8.7)

44 (9.1)

115 (23.8)

181 (37.5)

101 (20.9)

 What I learned from my personal genome sequencing will help reduce my chances of getting sick

83 (17.2)

104 (21.6)

175 (36.3)

78 (16.2)

42 (8.7)

 The information that I received about my genome will influence how I manage my health in the future

64 (13.3)

50 (10.4)

137 (28.4)

171 (35.5)

60 (12.5)

 I am disappointed that my results did not tell me more information

68 (14.2)

63 (13.1)

87 (18.1)

156 (32.5)

106 (22.1)

Attitudes regarding genome sequencing

 Personal genomic information should be part of a standard medical record

7 (1.5)

34 (7.2)

54 (11.4)

152 (32.2)

225 (47.7)

 Health insurance should cover personal genome sequencing

26 (5.5)

56 (11.8)

95 (20.0)

128 (26.9)

171 (35.9)

 Personal genome sequencing should only be available to people through their doctor

177 (37.3)

109 (23.0)

62 (13.1)

65 (13.7)

61 (12.9)

  1. aPercentages may not sum to 100 due to rounding. Percentages are not all based on denominator of 543 because of missing responses to some survey items. The percent of missing responses ranges between 11.0 and 13.1% (median = 11.8% missing)