Skip to main content

Table 2 DKMcost125 model performance on test sets

From: Identifying Crohn’s disease signal from variome analysis

Cutoff

CD-test

WTCCC and GTEx^

TP

FN

TN

FP

Prec %

Rec %

MCC

TP

FN

TN

FP

Prec %

Bal. Prec %

Rec %

MCC

45

9

40

13

0

100.0

18.4

0.212

384

2104

543

1

99.7

98.8

15.4

0.176

14.3

36

13

5

8

81.8

73.5

0.107

1432

1056

476

68

95.5

82.2

57.6

0.346

0

44

5

2

11

80.0

89.8

0.067

1924

564

302

242

88.8

63.5

77.3

0.279

  1. TP true positive (CDs predicted to be CD by AVA,Dx), FN false negative (CDs predicted to be HC), TN true negative (HCs predicted to be HC), FP false positive (HCs predicted to be CD), Prec precision, Rec recall of identifying CD patients (Eq. 2), Bal. Prec balanced precision, where the number of CD and HCs is standardized to represent 50% of the data, each. MCC is in Eq. 3. A more detailed performance evaluation is in Additional file 2: Tables S4 and S5
  2. ^WTCCC and GTEx panels were combined for evaluation since WTCCC contains only CD individuals and GTEx contains only HC individuals