Cutoff | CD-test | WTCCC and GTEx^ |
---|
TP | FN | TN | FP | Prec % | Rec % | MCC | TP | FN | TN | FP | Prec % | Bal. Prec % | Rec % | MCC |
---|
45 | 9 | 40 | 13 | 0 | 100.0 | 18.4 | 0.212 | 384 | 2104 | 543 | 1 | 99.7 | 98.8 | 15.4 | 0.176 |
14.3 | 36 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 81.8 | 73.5 | 0.107 | 1432 | 1056 | 476 | 68 | 95.5 | 82.2 | 57.6 | 0.346 |
0 | 44 | 5 | 2 | 11 | 80.0 | 89.8 | 0.067 | 1924 | 564 | 302 | 242 | 88.8 | 63.5 | 77.3 | 0.279 |
- TP true positive (CDs predicted to be CD by AVA,Dx), FN false negative (CDs predicted to be HC), TN true negative (HCs predicted to be HC), FP false positive (HCs predicted to be CD), Prec precision, Rec recall of identifying CD patients (Eq. 2), Bal. Prec balanced precision, where the number of CD and HCs is standardized to represent 50% of the data, each. MCC is in Eq. 3. A more detailed performance evaluation is in Additional file 2: Tables S4 and S5
- ^WTCCC and GTEx panels were combined for evaluation since WTCCC contains only CD individuals and GTEx contains only HC individuals