| |
Argentina n = 10
|
Chile n = 11
|
India n = 10
|
Vietnam n = 10
|
|---|
|
Tumour locationa
|
|
Caecum or ascending colon
|
5
|
5
|
2
|
0
|
|
Transverse colon
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Descending colon
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Sigmoid colon or rectum
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
8
|
|
Data not available
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Maximum tumour size in one direction
|
|
Median (cm) (range)
|
4 (0.7–7)
|
6 (2.5–11)
|
5 (3–5.5)
|
4 (3–5)
|
|
Data not available
|
2
|
0
|
7
|
0
|
|
Kruskal Wallis ANOVA p = 2.9 × 10−2 Post-hoc Dunn significant pairwise differences (Benjamini-Hochberg FDR adjusted): Chile vs Vietnam p = 3.5 × 10−2
|
|
Tumour stage (TNM8)a
|
|
T1
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
T2
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
0
|
|
T3
|
8
|
8
|
4
|
0
|
|
T4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
10
|
|
Data not available
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
- aTumour location and stage have not been tested for heterogeneity due to small numbers
