Skip to main content
Fig. 6 | Genome Medicine

Fig. 6

From: Phylogroup stability contrasts with high within sequence type complex dynamics of Escherichia coli bloodstream infection isolates over a 12-year period

Fig. 6

Comparison of STc69 strains in 2005 and 2016-7 collections. a Bar chart of the distribution of strains in the four subgroups of STc69 defined by fastbaps [52]. b Distribution of the number of virulence factors per strain among the six main functional classes of virulence. c Distribution of the adhesins in both collections. Only virulence factors with the most significant differences (i.e., significant before multiple test correction) between 2005 and 2016-7 are presented. d Predicted phenotypes of the strains. The results are presented as percentage of resistant strains for seven antibiotics of clinical importance (no strain resistant to carbapenems and amikacin has been found). Significant differences are highlighted by asterisks. AMP, ampicillin; TZP, piperacillin/tazobactam; CTX/CAZ, cefotaxime/ceftazidime; FEP, cefepime; FQ, fluoroquinolones; CARB, carbapenems; GEN, gentamicin; SXT, cotrimoxazole

Back to article page