Skip to main content

Table 3 Efficacy parameters in the two groups of patients with AGA treated with “matched therapy” versus “non-matched therapy”

From: Prospective high-throughput genome profiling of advanced cancers: results of the PERMED-01 clinical trial

 

Matched therapy

Non-matched therapy

p valuesb

N = 94

N = 160

N

% a

N

% a

PFS2/PFS1

 Median (range)

0.91 (0–14.9)

0.67 (0–25.3)

 

N with ratio ≥ 1.3 (95%CI)

32

36% (26–47)

26

20% (14–29)

0.013

 Missing

5

33

 

PFS2

 Median, months (95%CI)

2.9 (2.7–3.2)

2.8 (2.2–3.2)

 

 Missing

1

25

 

 6-month PFS2 (95%CI)

28% (20–39)

16% (11–24)

0.099

Clinical response

 Complete response

2

2%

2

1%

0.249

 Partial response

15

17%

33

24%

 

 Stable disease

14

16%

12

9%

 

 Progressive disease (PD)

58

65%

93

66%

 

 Disease control (DC) (95%CI)

31

35% (25–46)

47

34% (26–42)

0.887

 NA

5

 

20

  

PFS2 if DC

 Median, months (95%CI)

8.5 (6.9–19.8)

5.7 (5.4–7.3)

 

 6-month PFS2 (95%CI)

79% (66–95)

41% (29–58)

1.86E−03

 Missing

0

3

 

PFS2 if PD

 Median, months (95%CI)

1.9 (1.6–2.8)

1.9 (1.6–2.1)

 

 6-month PFS2 (95%CI)

2% (0–12)

1% (0–8)

0.824

 Missing

0

7

 

OS

 Median, months (95%CI)

8.1 (6.2–12.2)

8.9 (6.5–11.1)

 

 6-month OS (95%CI)

62% (52–73)

59% (51–68)

0.791

 Missing

3

11

 
  1. a% of informative cases; NA not assessable; bFisher’s exact test for categorical variables, log-rank test for 6-month survivals