Advantages | Drawbacks |
---|---|
Hypothesis-free in-depth characterization of cell populations [41] | Due to a low starting amount, transcripts can be missed during transverse transcription (“dropouts”), leading to a limited gene coverage [77] |
Detection of novel disease- and cell-type-specific biomarkers | False positive and false negative DE genes can lead to false discoveries [98] |
Can be combined with published CSF datasets to increase statistical power or non-CSF datasets to compare cell abundances or phenotypes between compartments, which improves the reproducibility across studies | Batch effect can be misinterpreted as novel biological findings while correction of batch effects entails the risk of removing biological variation [80, 99] |
Wide range of analyses possible with a plethora of computation tools [100] | Analyses remain mostly descriptive and cannot substitute mechanistic experiments [101] |
Because of limited CSF cell counts, deep-sequencing of CSF cells is affordable | Number of total available cells by limited by low CSF cell counts, thus relative cell frequencies can be biased and rare cell populations might be completely missed |
Increasingly multi-dimensional data collected simultaneously (proteome, transcriptome, epigenome) | Because of limited CSF cell counts, differential expression of rare cell populations between conditions can be unreliable [102] |