Skip to main content

Table 3 Clinically significant sequence variants uncovered by the deletions. Subjects #1 and #2 were identified in a COX10-phenotype-driven cohort analysis. Subjects #1, #3, and #4 were identified in the molecular-deletion-driven clinical exome data reanalysis

From: Sequencing individual genomes with recurrent genomic disorder deletions: an approach to characterize genes for autosomal recessive rare disease traits

ID

Deletion/ allele frequency

Gene (RefSeq transcript)

Genic variant

Genomic coordinate (GRCh38)

MAF in gnomAD v3.1

Classification

Category

1

17p12 HNPP/

3.148 × 10−4

COX10

(NM_001303.3)

c.1277_1282dup

(p.M426_L427dup)

chr17:14207158_ 14207163dup

0

VUS

NDAC

2

17p12 HNPP/

3.148 × 10−4

COX10

(NM_001303.3)

c.858G>T

(p.W286C)

chr17:14192151G>T

6.567 × 10−6

VUS

NDAC

3

10q11.21q11.23 deletion/

1.353 × 10−4

ERCC6

(NM_000124.3)

c.1490T>C

(p.F497S)

chr10:49505920A>G

0

VUS

NDAC

4

15q13.3 BP4-BP5 deletion/

9.97 × 10−5

OTUD7A

(NM_130901.2)

c.2023_2066del

(p.D675Hfs*188)

chr15:31484009_ 31484052del

6.58 × 10−5 a

VUS

NDGMC

5

16p11.2 proximal / 5.076 × 10−4

PRRT2

(NM_145239.2)

c.649dup

(p.R217fs*8)

chr16: 29813703dup

1.472 × 10−4 b

Pathogenic

NDGMC

  1. aThis variant is marked with “low complexity region” label in gnomAD, suggesting ambiguous variant call quality. It has a variant count of 2 in gnomAD v3.1. However, manual review of the alignment data from gnomAD suggests only 1 is of higher quality. The allele frequency is adjusted in half accordingly
  2. bThis variant is marked with “low complexity region” label in gnomAD, suggesting ambiguous variant call quality. It is located in a homopolymer region that is susceptible to false positive variant calling. The variant allele frequency quoted here may be overestimated
  3. Abbreviations: MAF, minor allele frequency; VUS, variant of unknown clinical significance; NDAC, new disease allele characterization; NDGMC, new disease gene/mechanism characterization