Skip to main content

Table 1 Single-variant association results for variants reaching exome-wide significance (p<4.3×10−7), or with evidence of replication in type 1 diabetes (p<0.05) or in the general population (p<0.05/27/8=2.3×10−4)

From: Whole-exome sequencing identifies novel protein-altering variants associated with serum apolipoprotein and lipid concentrations

Gene

Variant

MAF

SIFT/PolyPhen

Phenotype

N

P-value

Beta (se)

PRepl

P lipids

LIPC

15:58563549 C>T p.Thr405Met rs113298164

0.017

Deleterious, probably damaging

apoA1

918

7.8×10−8

0.98 (0.18)

0.89

apoA (UKBB): p=9.3×10−46

GTF3C5

9:133054787 C>T p.Ala382Val rs202207045

0.007b

Tolerated, benign

LDLC

894

1.3×10−6

−1.35 (0.28)

0.02

LDLC (Hindy): p=0.125

GTF3C5

9:133054787 C>T p.Ala382Val rs202207045

0.007b

Tolerated, benign

Non-HDLC

919

7.3×10−7

−1.38 (0.28)

0.02

Non-HDLC (Hindy) p=0.199

FNDC3A

13:49201861 A>G p.Thr1017Ala rs45604939

0.064

Deleterious, probably damaging

CHOLa

748

8.8×10−6

0.46 (0.10)

0.04

CHOL (Hindy) p=0.35

PPIC

5:123023945 T>C p.Asn190Ser rs451195

0.156

Deletorious, benign

HDLFC L

487

5.0×10−6

0.43 (0.09)

0.87

HDLC (GLGC) p=2.1×10−7

ZNF274

19:58206912 A>G p.Gln118Arg rs45580533

0.021

Tolerated, benign

VLDL L

487

9.3 ×10−6

−1.02 (0.23)

0.87

LDL (GLGC) p=3.0×10−13

ZNF274

19:58206912 A>G p.Gln118Arg rs45580533

0.021

Tolerated, benign

VLDLTG L

748

5.5 ×10−6

−10.5 (0.23)

0.81

TG (GLGC) p=0.003

  1. Variant chromosome:base pair position with REF>ALT alleles, amino acid change, and rs identifier, MAF minor allele frequency, SIFT/Polyphen predicted effect, Beta (se) effect size beta and standard error, PReplP-value for replication in GWAS data, P lipids the lowest p-value within the GLGC GWAS, UKBB WES, and lipid WES (Hindy et al.) for the corresponding or closest matching lipid phenotype
  2. ars45604939 association with total cholesterol was obtained for the NMR measured total cholesterol; replication with standard laboratory total cholesterol
  3. brs202207045 MAF in Hindy et al. was markedly lower, 2.5×10−5