Skip to main content
Download PDF

Genomics of circadian rhythms in health and disease

Genome Medicine volume 11, Article number: 82 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Circadian clocks are endogenous oscillators that control 24-h physiological and behavioral processes. The central circadian clock exerts control over myriad aspects of mammalian physiology, including the regulation of sleep, metabolism, and the immune system. Here, we review advances in understanding the genetic regulation of sleep through the circadian system, as well as the impact of dysregulated gene expression on metabolic function. We also review recent studies that have begun to unravel the circadian clock’s role in controlling the cardiovascular and nervous systems, gut microbiota, cancer, and aging. Such circadian control of these systems relies, in part, on transcriptional regulation, with recent evidence for genome-wide regulation of the clock through circadian chromosome organization. These novel insights into the genomic regulation of human physiology provide opportunities for the discovery of improved treatment strategies and new understanding of the biological underpinnings of human disease.

Background

Circadian rhythms are driven by an internal timing system regulated at the transcriptional level that gives rise to gene networks that oscillate with a 24-h cycle. Within these networks are clock genes that control rhythms in physiology and behavior. Interestingly, the circadian clock genes were among the first genes to be identified as controlling behavior. Following studies by Konopka and Benzer [1], who identified the first circadian mutant—period—in fruit flies, a forward-genetic behavioral screen was implemented in mice. Through this screen, the first circadian mutant mouse was identified [2], followed by the cloning of the first mammalian circadian gene, Clock [3]. Research into the mechanisms of mammalian circadian rhythms then exploded, with many additional genes added to the clock core loop [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11] (Fig. 1). Since then, it has become clear that the circadian system plays an overarching role in regulating human physiology [46]. Recent studies have provided further lessons on how disruption of circadian rhythms is associated with sleep disorders [47, 48], cancer [49, 50], susceptibility to infections [51, 52], metabolic syndrome [53], Alzheimer’s disease [54], and aging [55]. There is also some indication that, in addition to controlling circadian gene expression, clock genes can influence other cellular functions in a non-circadian manner [56].

Fig. 1
figure1

Timeline of major findings in mammalian circadian clock research. 1920s: first long-term recordings of locomotor rhythms in rats (reviewed in [12]). 1960: Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Biological Clocks. First observations that time of day determines susceptibility to endotoxins [13]. 1972: lesion studies show that the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus regulates adrenal corticosterone and drinking behavior rhythms [14, 15]. Late 1970s and 1980s: first ENU screens for novel gene identification were performed in mammals [16]. 1984–1990: identification of the SCN as a master regulator through transplantation experiments [17, 18]. 1988: a naturally occurring circadian Tau mutation was identified in hamsters [19]. 1990s: first mammalian ENU screens for behavior, leading to the identification of the first mammalian clock gene, Clock [2]. 1995: circadian rhythms were shown to be cell-autonomous in mammals, being retained in isolated SCN neurons [20]. 1997: cloning of the Clock gene, which was shown to belong to the bHLH–PAS family of transcription factors. In the same year, the mammalian Per1 gene was also cloned, both providing entry points for identifying the mechanism of circadian rhythmicity in mammals [3, 8]. 1998–2000: Discovery of BMAL1/MOP3 as the partner of CLOCK [5, 11], repression by CRY [10] and the Per1/2-Cry1/2 feedback loop on CLOCK:BMAL1 [21]. First descriptions of circadian clocks in the periphery [22, 23]. The cloning of the hamster Tau mutant identified CK1ε as an important kinase regulating the core circadian clock [24]. 2000s: melanopsin was identified as the circadian photoreceptor in the retina [25,26,27]. 2001: first mutation in a clock gene associated with human disease [28]. 2002: first circadian transcriptomes revealed a significant subset of genes that have cyclic gene expression with a 24-h period [29,30,31]. 2004–2005: association of mutations in clock genes with impaired metabolism [32, 33]. 2011: peroxiredoxin cycles reported to be independent of transcription [34]. 2011–2012: detailed descriptions of genome-wide regulation by the clock [35,36,37,38]. 2012–2013: major advances in our understanding of the clock control of immunity [39,40,41,42]. Present day: a new layer in our understanding of genome-wide regulation by the clock through circadian chromosome organization is emerging [43,44,45]. ENU, N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea

Full size image

This review focuses on the most recent advances in mammalian circadian rhythms research, highlighting novel techniques and explaining the importance and implications of these research findings for human disease, translational research, and medicine. We discuss a number of modern genomics approaches to the study of circadian rhythms, such as the evaluation of chromatin dynamics and gene regulation. Owing to the circadian functions that are common to these diseases, another factor that we highlight is the opportunity to intervene using the timed administration of drugs (chrono-pharmacology) or by targeting clock components. Indeed, as we discuss throughout this review, there may be great benefits to considering circadian timing in the treatment of metabolic disorders, cardiovascular disease, and cancer [53, 57, 58].

Current view of the mammalian molecular clock

The circadian clock in mammals is cell-autonomous and depends on transcriptional autoregulatory feedback loops (Fig. 2). Circadian rhythms are also tuned at the post-transcriptional [59] and post-translational levels [60], although gene transcription remains vital for making the clock ‘tick’. Genome-wide approaches (Additional file 1: Table S1) have found that rhythmic transcription is accompanied by rhythmic transcription factor binding and histone modifications in enhancer regions [61], as well as by circadian recruitment of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to DNA [35, 36, 62]. An additional layer of regulation involves chromosome organization, with interactions of active and repressive chromosomal domains undergoing circadian oscillations [63,64,65,66,67].

Fig. 2
figure2

The circadian gene network and layers of genome-wide regulation in mammals. At the core of the network, the transcription factors CLOCK and BMAL1 activate the Per1, Per2, Cry1, and Cry2 genes (here we show Per2 and Cry1 as examples), whose protein products (PER and CRY) repress their own transcription. The PER and CRY proteins are post-translationally regulated by parallel E3 ubiquitin ligase pathways (FBXL3 and FBXL21 for CRY and β-TrCP for PER), with PER levels being also regulated by CK1. CLOCK and BMAL1 also regulate the expression of the Nr1d1/2 genes, which encode the nuclear receptors REV-ERBα/β, respectively. These nuclear receptors rhythmically repress the transcription of Bmal1 and Nfil3, two genes that are activated by retinoic acid-related orphan receptor-α/β (RORα/β). In turn, NFIL3 together with D-box binding protein (DBP), as well as CLOCK and BMAL1, regulate a rhythm in the REV-ERBα/β nuclear receptors. These three interlocked transcriptional feedback loops regulate the majority of cycling genes, leading to rhythms in various different physiological systems, from sleep to metabolism and aging (bottom of figure). Note that the E- and D-boxes and the RORE-binding regions are in cis upstream at the promoter; however, they are represented here as a stacked box for simplicity. Recent work has identified additional levels of regulation of circadian gene expression (outer layer of regulation in the figure), including rhythmic histone modifications, RNA polymerase II (Pol II) recruitment, circadian chromosomal conformation interactions and post-translational modifications (PTMs). Please refer to Table S1 for many of the studies that allowed the external regulatory layers to be added to the comprehensive view of the clock

Full size image

Recently, studies in mouse tissues have greatly enhanced our understanding of the circadian regulatory mechanisms for rhythmic transcription [43,44,45, 68, 69]. Sobel et al. [68] characterized the chromatin accessibility landscape by mapping DNase I hypersensitive sites (DHSs) in mouse liver across 24 h. DHS sites reflect open chromatin and their occupation of transcription start sites (TSSs), enhancers, and silencers mean that they are hallmarks of regulatory DNA. In this study, the authors found that 8% of 65,000 DHSs cycled with a 24-h period, in phase with Pol II binding and histone 3 lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27ac) marks, suggesting that regulatory elements within DHSs control rhythmic transcription [68]. Two additional studies have further advanced our understanding of chromatin interactions [43, 44]. Mermet et al. [43] utilized circular chromosome conformation capture sequencing (4C-seq) to explore the three-dimensional chromatin interactions of a locus of interest with other genomic regions (one-to-all). They examined the TSSs of the clock repressor gene Cryptochrome 1 (Cry1) and of a liver-specific clock-controlled gene, Gys2 (Glycogen synthetase 2), which encodes the rate-limiting enzyme in hepatic glycogen synthesis. These genes show rhythmic transcription with opposite phases, allowing the authors to correlate their chromatin interaction profiles with their gene transcription regulation. The authors found that chromatin contact with such regions increases at the time of the day when the corresponding gene has its peak expression. Strikingly, abrogation of an enhancer that is rhythmically recruited to the Cry1 promoter leads to a shortened period of locomotor activity, suggesting that such interacting loops are necessary for the modulation of rhythmic behaviors [43]. Together, these studies show that rhythmic modulation of chromatin conformation adds an important layer of control over circadian gene transcription (Fig. 2).

Despite these genome-wide advances, our understanding of circadian regulation at the protein level is much more limited, mostly because of the difficulty of quantitative assessment of the proteome [70, 71]. Recent technological advances have allowed quantification of the circadian proteome, the nuclear proteome [72], and the phospho-proteome [73]. These studies revealed the rhythmic presence of about 500 proteins (~ 10%) in the nucleus that are components of nuclear complexes involved in transcriptional regulation, ribosome biogenesis, DNA repair, and the cell cycle [72]. Strikingly, more than 5000 (~ 25%) phosphorylation sites are rhythmic, far exceeding rhythms in protein abundance (phosphorylation is an example of post-translational modification (PTM); Fig. 2). Overall, recent studies have vastly enhanced our understanding of the genome-wide reach of the molecular clock and how it is regulated.

Circadian control of sleep

Human circadian sleep disorders and their genetic causes

In humans, mutations in circadian clocks have been associated with circadian rhythm sleep disorders. Familial advanced sleep phase disorder (FASPD) is a circadian rhythm sleep disorder with habitual sleep times that are earlier than the societal norm. The first identified cause of FASPD was a missense mutation (S662G) in the PER2 gene [28]. Casein kinases Iδ and Iε (CKIδ/ε) regulate levels of PER2 by phosphorylation-mediated degradation and cellular localization (Fig. 2). The S662G mutation appears to be in the CKIε binding site, which causes hypophosphorylation by CKIε in vitro. Deficient phosphorylation of PER2 in the cytoplasm may impair its degradation and lead to nuclear accumulation [28, 74]. FASPD has also been linked to a missense mutation (T44A) in the human CKIδ gene. This mutation leads to reduced kinase activity in vitro and to a shorter circadian period in mice [75]. Recently, Hirano and colleagues [48] described another missense mutation in the human CRY2 gene that is associated with FASPD. The alanine to threonine mutation (A260T) in CRY2 is located in its flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) binding domain. Such mutation increases the affinity of FAD for the E3 ubiquitin ligase FBXL3, thus promoting its degradation (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Highlights of circadian regulation across different physiological systems. Sleep: overview of circadian disruptions that directly modulate the timing and quality of sleep in humans [28, 47, 48, 76, 77] and the consequences of poor rhythms [78,79,80]. The outer layers represent the time at which individuals who have either familial advanced sleep phase disorder (FASPD) or delayed sleep phase disorder (DSPD) usually sleep. Metabolism: the integration of corticosterone rhythmic signaling by PPARγ in adipogenesis [81] and the metabolic consequences of disrupted rhythms [32, 33]. Cardiovascular system: neutrophils and monocytes adhere to atherosclerotic plaques (represented as the yellow mass in the inner side of the blood vessel) during the transition from the active to the resting period [57]. Clock disruption also impacts the vascular system [82]. Aging: reprogramming of circadian gene expression in stem cells in aging [83] and the consequences of poor rhythms [84]. Microbiota: gut microbiota upregulate NFIL3 levels, which modulate lipid uptake and body fat [85]. Cancer: disruption of the circadian clock leads to enhanced cell proliferation and tumorigenesis [49, 50]

Full size image

A less understood, but more common, type of circadian rhythm sleep disorder, with an estimated prevalence of almost 10% in the general population, is delayed sleep phase disorder (DSPD; reviewed in [86]). It is characterized as a type of insomnia with inconsistent and delayed sleep onset and offset times compared to the societal norm. Familial cases of DSPD have been described, suggesting that Mendelian inheritance of DSPD may exist with polymorphisms in the CLOCK or PER3 genes (reviewed in [87]). Patke et al. [47] recently reported a hereditary form of DSPD that is associated with a mutation in CRY1, in the 5′ splice site of exon 11, which leads to skipping of exon 11 and ultimately to an in-frame deletion of 24 residues in the C-terminal region of CRY1. Such changes lead to an enhanced affinity of this repressor for the circadian activator proteins CLOCK and BMAL1, which lengthens the period of circadian molecular rhythms [47] (Fig. 3). Together with the studies on FASPD, human genetics has helped to unravel some of the circadian drivers of sleep; nevertheless, there is still much to be learned about how these signals permit or inhibit sleep cycles. With biobanks increasing in size and the advent of direct-to-consumer genetic testing provided by companies such as 23andMe, the genetic information available about populations has increased. Taking advantage of such data, multiple loci have been associated with chronotype, that is, whether people describe themselves as morning people (‘larks’) or as evening people (‘owls’) in terms of sleeping habits. Among the genetic hits associated with chronotype are known clock genes, such as PER1, CRY1, and BMAL1 [88].

Circadian genomics and sleep regulation

In mice, a recent study has suggested a novel link between metabolism and sleep regulation. Salt-inducible kinase 3 (SIK3) is a serine-threonine kinase in the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) family that is known to act as an energy sensor. Not surprisingly, Sik3−/− mice exhibit severe metabolic symptoms, such as hypolipidemia and hypoglycemia, many dying immediately after birth [89]. SIK3 impacts the stability of the PER2 protein, but unlike Per2 mutants [6], Sik3−/− mice have a longer circadian period based on activity and, perhaps as a result of this, show a 6-h phase delay in their oxygen consumption rhythm. Curiously, a point mutation in Sik3 that causes a profound increase in total sleep time has been identified in a forward-genetics screen [90]. Whole-exome sequencing revealed that the mutation led to the skipping of exon 13, encompassing the protein kinase A (PKA) recognition site in SIK3. However, in contrast with the phenotype observed in the Sik3−/− mice, there was no effect on circadian period length as assessed by wheel-running behavior under constant darkness [90]. Taken together, it seems that (at least in mice) SIK3 has a critical role in the regulation of sleep and circadian rhythms.

Circadian control of metabolism

Driven by the circadian clock, a regular daily pattern of eating and fasting maintains normal circadian physiology. However, recurrent disruption of daily activity–rest rhythms, and thus feeding patterns (as occurs in shift workers), is associated with metabolic syndrome [91]. Genetic disruption of the circadian clock also predisposes rodents to metabolic disease [32, 33]. The clock controls metabolism directly by driving transcriptional programs for certain metabolic pathways. For example, CRY1 suppresses hepatic gluconeogenesis during fasting through the regulation of cAMP/CREB signaling, the rhythmic repression of the glucocorticoid receptor gene, and the suppression of nuclear FOXO1 that, in turn, downregulates gluconeogenesis [92,93,94]. Another clock repressor, PER2, controls lipid metabolism by direct regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) and mitochondrial rate-limiting enzymes [95, 96]. The nuclear hormone receptors, REV-ERBs, also directly regulate the transcription of several key rate-limiting enzymes for fatty acid and cholesterol metabolism [97] (reviewed in [98]). Disruption of CLOCK and BMAL1 has also been associated with obesity, hyperinsulinemia, and diabetes [32, 33, 99, 100]. The circadian posttranscriptional regulator Nocturnin also controls lipid and cholesterol metabolism [101]. Recently, an atlas of circadian metabolic profiles across eight tissues revealed temporal cohesion among tissues, whereas nutritional challenge (a high-fat diet) impacted each tissue differentially [102]. In addition to direct modulation of mammalian metabolism, indirect control by the clock occurs through its regulation of behavior, food intake, and the oscillation of hormones such as insulin, glucagon, peptide YY, glucagon-like peptide 1, corticosterone, leptin, and ghrelin (reviewed in [103]). Although we know much about the circadian clock’s control of metabolism, the mechanisms behind this control are far from understood [104]. How nutritional challenges dysregulate the clock and how clock disruption increases adipogenesis remain open questions in the field. However, recent studies have contributed to our understanding of such complex phenomena.

Dietary influences on circadian enhancers

In recent years, time-restricted feeding has revolutionized dietary restriction protocols. Body weight increases are kept to a minimum even when animals are placed on high-fat and/or high-fructose diets by simply restricting food ingestion to an 8–12-h window [105, 106] (reviewed in [107]). The time during which food is consumed should be in sync with the animals’ circadian rhythms, as misalignment leads to metabolic dysfunction [108,109,110,111]. In addition, nutrient-sensing neurons (AgRP) experience daily rhythms in response to leptin [112]. The nutritive environment itself appears to impact feeding behavior and imposes dramatic changes in circadian gene expression in diet-induced obesity (DIO) models [113, 114]. Recently, Guan et al. [53] showed that one of these DIO-related changes is the development of newly rhythmic oscillations of the lipogenic transcription factor sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP), which regulates fatty acid synthesis and oxidation, and of the peroxisome proliferated activated receptor alpha (PPARα), a major regulator of fatty acid oxidation. This is likely to be a consequence of circadian rhythms that are evoked at the enhancers of genes that are not normally rhythmic [53]. Moreover, a PPARα agonist (WY-14,643) is more efficacious in lowering lipids when administered at the circadian peak of PPARα expression. This suggests benefit in considering chrono-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of metabolic disorders.

In search of compounds that modulate the circadian system, an earlier study utilized cell-based circadian reporter assays for high-throughput screening of 200,000 synthetic small molecules. This study revealed compounds that both lengthen and shorten period in both central and/or peripheral clocks [115] (reviewed in [116]). From another more recent screen, nobiletin (NOB), a natural polymethoxylated flavone, was identified as a clock amplitude-enhancing small molecule. In mice with metabolic syndrome caused by DIO or by genetic disruption (db/db obese mice), NOB augments energy expenditure and locomotor activity in a Clock gene-dependent manner, while also strongly blunting body-weight gain, lowering fasting glucose levels, and improving glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity. However, these beneficial effects of NOB are absent in DIO Clock mutants [117], suggesting the potential for pharmacological modulation of metabolism through the enhancement of circadian rhythms. These results, together with those of the other studies on DIO, clearly show that the nutritional environment can have drastic effects on circadian rhythms.

Adipocyte differentiation

Glucocorticoids and other adipogenic hormones are secreted in mammals in a circadian manner. In addition, high-resolution automated sampling has allowed the identification of ultradian glucocorticoid cycles of approximately 1-h period, and with higher amplitude coinciding with the onset of circadian activity [118]. Loss of glucocorticoid circadian oscillations correlates with obesity in humans, but how do hormone dynamics affect adipocyte differentiation? In a compelling quantitative study, Bahrami-Nejad et al. [81] recently showed that adipocyte differentiation does not progress under normal circadian hormonal cycles. Instead, differentiation is induced if the period of the pulses shortens or if the hormonal signal is flat or continuously elevated [81]. Aberrant glucocorticoid profiles may be caused by abnormal feeding or sleep cycles, long-term glucocorticoid hormone treatment, chronic stress, or metabolic syndrome [119] (Fig. 3). When daily glucocorticoid oscillations are flattened, there is an increase in the mass of subcutaneous and visceral fat pads in mice [81]. This adipocyte differentiation appears to be linked to PPARγ, which acts as a filter of circadian hormonal stimuli. Using these studies as a jumping off point, it will be exciting to find out how ultradian rhythms of glucocorticoids are integrated and what additional circadian factors are critical for regulating adipogenesis.

Autophagy and circadian rhythms

A recently described link between circadian clocks and autophagy unravels the previously unappreciated role of this degradation pathway in recycling circadian proteins. Autophagy, which degrades cytoplasmic contents in lysosomes, also degrades the repressor CRY1. As mentioned previously, CRY1 suppresses hepatic gluconeogenesis. Toledo et al. [120] investigated the role of autophagy in the regulation of the liver clock and glucose metabolism. They found that the timely degradation of CRY1 by autophagic pathways allows glucose production [120]. Interestingly, obesity increases the autophagic degradation of CRY1, leading to higher glucose production and higher blood-sugar levels. By contrast, loss of autophagy leads to the accumulation of CRY1 and therefore disrupts the clock [120]. These results further highlight that the regulation of clock rhythmicity is itself complex and intertwined with central processes and molecules in our cells. The mechanisms that define the diurnal window of autophagy within cells and the specific timing of the autophagic degradation of CRY1 remain puzzling. These findings also beg the question: what other central processes in cells involve the circadian system? We believe it is likely that many additional functions of circadian rhythms will be uncovered.

Circadian control of the immune system

Dramatic temporal variation in sensitivity to endotoxins between morning and evening was first discovered in the 1960s [13]; but only in the past decade have major inroads been made in our understanding of clock control over the immune system (Fig. 1). Circadian clock control impinges upon many aspects of the immune response, from the trafficking of immune cells, to the activation of innate and adaptive immunity, to host–pathogen interactions. There have been thorough reviews of these topics [121], so instead we highlight the most recent findings.

Immune cell trafficking

Cells of the innate immune system, such as neutrophils and monocytes, exhibit circadian patterns of migration from the blood to tissues [122]. Furthermore, T and B lymphocytes, which are cells of the adaptive immune system, were also recently shown to exhibit strong circadian oscillations in the blood, with their numbers peaking during an organism’s resting phase. This rhythmicity continues as lymphocytes are trafficked to the lymph nodes [123,124,125], with lymphocyte homing to lymph nodes peaking at activity onset, and cells leaving the tissue during the resting period. Using lineage-specific genetic ablation of circadian clock function, Druzd et al. [125] demonstrated that the periodic presence of lymphocytes in the lymph nodes is dependent on the rhythmic expression of promigratory factors on lymphocytes. The rhythmic trafficking of immune cells has also been associated with chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression and is regulated by glucocorticoids [126]. A recent study sheds light on the role of the Interleukin-7 receptor (IL-7R) in this process. IL-7R, whose signaling promotes the proliferation, survival, and differentiation of T cells, has a putative glucocorticoid response element (GRE) on its enhancer; thus, in the presence of glucocorticoids, IL-7R transcription is activated [127]. Intriguingly, glucocorticoids induce IL-7R with a diurnal rhythm, thereby increasing CXCR4 expression and supporting T cell survival and recruitment to various tissues. Moreover, the diurnal variation in T cell distribution enhances immune responses to soluble antigens and systemic bacterial infection at night [124]. Taken together, these findings suggest that cells of the immune system are capable of responding to circadian cues to maximize their ability to respond to infection.

Clock regulation of innate and adaptive immunity

What role do clock proteins play in regulating the immune system? Several interesting studies have examined the interplay between clock proteins and immune system function [121, 128]. At present, the anti-inflammatory effects of BMAL1 and REV-ERBα are the best understood [39]. Lineage-specific ablation of Bmal1 in macrophages, the primary effector cells of the innate immune system, eliminates the rhythmic cytokine storm response to endotoxins [39]. It also leads to the abolition of daily protection against sepsis that naturally occurs in mice during the early rest phase [122]. This may be related in part to the regulation of Bmal1 expression by the microRNA miR-155 in myeloid cells. Endotoxins repress BMAL1 through the targeting of miR-155 to seed sequences in the 3′ untranslated region of Bmal1. Thus, the induction of proinflammatory miR-155 correlates inversely with levels of BMAL1. In wild-type mice, BMAL1 inhibits miR-155 induction and protects mice from lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced sepsis [129].

Recently, Sutton and colleagues [130] shed some light on how circadian disruption may be linked with an increased incidence of autoimmune disease. Using an autoimmune disease model of multiple sclerosis, the authors show that loss of myeloid BMAL1 creates an inflammatory environment in the central nervous system (CNS) through the expansion and infiltration of IL-1β-secreting monocytes. The result is an increase in pathogenic T lymphocytes, which may contribute to the neuroinflammation and demyelination observed in this disease model [130]. These studies highlight the complexity of immune response coordination between innate and adaptive immune cells and a layer of regulation by the circadian clock.

An additional piece of the puzzle of how the clock regulates the immune response in macrophages is the fact that BMAL1 controls the levels of the antioxidant-encoding gene Nrf2, by directly binding an E-box in its promoter in myeloid cells [131]. In macrophages, reactive oxygen species (ROS) promote the production of the cytokine IL-1β via stabilization of HIF-1α [132], which induces the expression of downstream proinflammatory molecules [133]. On the other hand, NRF2 is a transcription factor that protects cells against oxidative damage. Early et al. [131] showed that activation of NRF2, by either genetic or pharmacological methods, rescues the proinflammatory phenotype of Bmal1−/− macrophages. These findings suggest a role for the molecular clock in regulating NRF2 in innate immune cells to control the inflammatory response [131]. Despite our increasing understanding of how the clock modulates immune responses, further studies are required to elucidate fully the role of circadian rhythms in immune surveillance and activity.

Host–pathogen interactions

Many studies have shown that the outcome of an infection (whether bacterial, viral, or parasitic) depends on the time of day at which the infection is initiated [40, 51, 52, 134]. For example, Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. typhimurium) levels are higher following an infection during the rest phase when compared with infection initiated in the middle of the active phase in mice. This difference is dependent on a functional copy of CLOCK [40]. Similarly, time-of-day of host infection influences virus progression both in live mice and in individual cells. Viral infections of herpes, influenza A, and respiratory viruses of the Paramyxoviridae family are enhanced when host circadian rhythms are abolished by disrupting the Bmal1 gene [52, 135]. Bmal1−/− mice that were intranasally infected with the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) had a higher viral load than wild-type mice [135]. Interestingly, Ehlers et al. [136] found that the misalignment of circadian rhythms through chronic jet lag exacerbates acute viral bronchiolitis caused by Sendai virus (SeV) or influenza A virus in mice [136]. Notably, the authors also showed that in humans, respiratory tract expression of most clock genes (BMAL1, NPAS2, PER2, DBP, and NR1D1 [REV-ERB α]) is reduced in adult asthma patients.

Parasite infection also depends on the timing of the host circadian cycle. Leishmania parasite burden is circadian in nature, and Bmal1 in non-lymphocyte immune cells (monocytes) is responsible for modulating the magnitude of Leishmania infection [51]. Similar findings were described for the intestinal parasitic helminth Trichuris muris, with mice infected at the start of the active phase showing delayed resistance to infection. Remarkably, this response pattern appears to be shifted with daytime-restricted feeding. Cell-lineage-specific genetic ablation of Bmal1 in antigen-presenting dendritic cells (DCs) in vivo also leads to a loss of time-of-day dependency of helminth expulsion from the body, the result of the resistance to infection [134]. Therefore, the circadian clock (with focus to date mainly on BMAL1) can regulate cellular immunity against bacteria, viruses, and parasites.

Infections or the resulting inflammation can also disrupt the circadian clock by dramatically decreasing the amplitude of circadian rhythms. This has been seen in infections with the causative agents of Chagas disease (Trypanosoma cruzi) [137], sleeping sickness (Trypanosoma brucei) [138], and malaria (Plasmodium chabaudi) [138]. Such downregulation of the expression of clock genes appears to be a consequence of the massive immune response to invasion, as it has also been demonstrated that proinflammatory cytokines are able to decrease the amplitude of rhythms in vitro. Moreover, this type of immune response also alters the animal’s behavior, reproducing what is known as ‘sickness-like behavior’ [139]. Recently, our own study of sleeping sickness (a disease that is almost always fatal if left untreated) concluded that the parasite may disrupt the sleep of patients through the modulation of their circadian clocks. This dysregulation appears to be caused, at least in part, by a systemic signal (possibly secreted by the parasite or possibly a host molecule that is produced in response to infection) that is responsible for shortening the circadian clock period [138]. In summary, although mostly understood from the side of the host’s immune system (and perhaps metabolism), host–pathogen interactions are also subjected to circadian modulation. It is also likely that the circadian rhythms of the pathogens play a role [140]. Further studies are needed to understand these interactions fully.

Commensal microbiota and circadian rhythms

The metabolic interactions between the gut and its microbiome have been a major research focus in the past decade, and both the host and microbiota rhythms seem to affect one another. Disruption of clock genes in the host abolishes rhythms in the abundance of certain microbiota [141], which seem to be restored upon time-restricted feeding [141, 142]. On the other hand, the absence of gut microbes perturbs the expression of circadian clock genes in the mouse liver [143]. Thaiss et al. [142] showed that the intestinal microbiota in mice undergoes rhythmic fluctuations in its biogeography and metabolome patterns. Recently, Wang et al. [85] found that body composition is regulated by the gut microbiota via the transcription factor NFIL3. This is a circadian basic leucine zipper transcription factor that is expressed in immune cells (Fig. 2). Its levels also oscillate diurnally in intestinal epithelial cells and the rhythms are enhanced by microbiota, as Nfil3 expression is reduced in germ-free animals. Curiously, the authors found that epithelial-cell-specific Nfil3 knockout mice were resistant to DIO, and that epithelial NFIL3 controls the expression of a circadian lipid metabolic program and regulates lipid absorption in intestinal epithelial cells (Fig. 3). A recent study also showed that the circadian clock in intestinal cells (focusing on group 3 innate lymphoid cells, ILC3s) is important in regulating susceptibility to bowel infection and lipid metabolism [144]. Altogether, these studies have added a new layer of complexity to the notions of mammalian circadian rhythms and of how the commensal microbiota play a role in homeostasis and body composition.

Circadian rhythms in the cardiovascular system

Cardiovascular complications have higher incidence in the morning. Many different studies have connected the clock with cardiovascular function, including daily variation in blood pressure, and even response to aspirin [82, 145, 146]. Some studies suggest that pharmacological targeting of REV-ERB decreases atherosclerotic plaque burden in mice [147]. On the other hand, other studies suggest that deletion of Bmal1 in myeloid cells increased monocyte recruitment and atherosclerosis lesion size [148]. A recent study has shed light on a mechanism that may contribute to this phenomenon. The adherence of myeloid cells to microvascular beds peaks during the early active phase, which appears to be a consequence of peak cell recruitment to atherosclerotic lesions 12 h earlier [57]. Winter et al. [57] showed that both the upregulation of cell adhesion molecules during the active phase by endothelial cells and the presence of immobilized chemokines (emitted by either endothelial cells or myeloid cells) on arterial vessels attract leukocytes into atherosclerotic lesions. Thus, the chemokine CCL2 (C-C motif chemokine ligand 2) and its receptor CCR2 (C-C motif chemokine receptor 2) are at the core of this daily pattern of leukocyte migration and adhesion to the lesions. Importantly, the authors found that timed pharmacological CCR2 neutralization caused inhibition of atherosclerosis without disturbing microvascular recruitment, providing a proof-of-principle treatment schedule for chrono-pharmacological intervention in atherosclerosis (Fig. 3).

Loss of Bmal1 results in an acceleration of aging and a shortened life span in mice [84]. The cardiovascular system is among the systems affected by aging, with Bmal1−/− mice being predisposed to developing atherosclerosis. Using an inducible knockout (iKO), Yang et al. [149] tested whether these age-related phenotypes remained if mice lost BMAL1 as adults. They found that both Bmal1−/− and iKO models exhibit markers consistent with accelerated aging (ocular abnormalities and brain astrogliosis), behavioral disruption, and transcriptional dysregulation. This is consistent with the fact that conditional ablation of the pancreatic clock still causes diabetes mellitus [99]. However, some other biomarkers of aging, including premature death in Bmal1−/− mice, were not replicated in the iKOs [149]. Among those, the predisposition for atherosclerosis appears to be reversed in iKOs [149]. These data suggest that some of the cardiovascular phenotypes associated with Bmal1 depletion may result from Bmal1 function during development. Although it is clear that there is a link between the circadian clock and atherosclerosis, further dissection of the importance of BMAL1 and other clock proteins in this disease is warranted.

Circadian rhythms in the nervous system

Circadian rhythms in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) have been the focus of many years of research; but how the SCN imposes rhythmicity throughout the body (or even locally in the brain) is not fully understood. Recent studies have broadened the focus from neurons to astrocytes, demonstrating the important role of these glial cells in maintaining circadian rhythmicity [150,151,152]. A recent circadian atlas of non-human primates includes 64 tissues in the body, including 22 different regions in the brain [153]. The authors found genes cycling across the day in all brain regions, providing a comprehensive view of the reach of the circadian clock throughout the CNS of baboons [153]. While further studies are needed to understand fully the impact of rhythms in the nervous system and all their potential functions, the following studies are a step in that direction.

Circadian rhythms in the blood–brain barrier

The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is highly selective as to what it allows into the brain, and its permeability is regulated (in part) by the circadian clock. Mice that lack Bmal1 in both the CNS and peripheral nervous system exhibit BBB hyperpermeability with an age-dependent loss of pericyte coverage of blood vessels in the brain [154], suggesting that the circadian clock regulates BBB homeostasis. Consistent with this, the Drosophila ‘BBB’ is more permeable at night [155]. The fly ‘BBB’ consists of a layer of subperineurial glia and perineurial glia that surrounds the entire CNS. Zhang et al. [155] showed that at night, the perineurial glia clock increases gap junctions and lowers Mg2+ levels, reducing transporter efflux activity; thus, xenobiotics are taken up by the brain. As passage through the BBB is necessary for the treatment of CNS diseases, these findings may have very practical applications. In a proof-of-principle experiment, Zhang and colleagues [155] also demonstrated that an anti-seizure drug is more effective when administered at night. Altogether, as the insect and mammalian BBB share many structural and functional similarities, this is a potentially major finding for human physiology.

Effects of light in mood and learning

Light is a strong external signal for the circadian system [156]. Its detection involves three classes of photoreceptors in the retina: classic rods and cones, and a subset of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) that express the photopigment melanopsin (Opn4), which makes them intrinsically photosensitive (ipRGCs) [25,26,27]. When ipRGCs are lost, the SCN no longer receives light information. Unexpectedly, ablation of these photoreceptors in mice affects mood and learning, indicating that ipRGCs are sensory cells that drive these behavioral effects [156]. Fernandez et al. [157] recently showed that these neurons relay light information that influences cognitive functions in an SCN-independent manner. Instead, an SCN-independent subset of ipRGCs connects to the perihabenular nucleus of the thalamus [157]. In summary, there appear to be two distinct retina–brain pathways that integrate light and highlight its influence on learning and mood. This takes us one step closer to research aiming to investigate light modulation as a potential strategy for treating mood disorders.

Circadian disruption in cancer

Epidemiological studies have linked circadian disruption to increased cancer susceptibility in all key organ systems [158,159,160]. Compelling evidence has shown that polymorphisms in the core circadian genes Per1, Per2, and Per3 are frequently found in human cancers, resulting in decreased expression of these genes [158], and that oncogenic MYC suppresses the clock [161]. Genetic loss of Per2 or Bmal1 promotes lung tumorigenesis in mice, leading to increased c-Myc expression, enhanced proliferation, and metabolic dysregulation [50]. Similarly, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is induced by chronic jet lag in mice in a manner similar to that observed in obese humans: beginning with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), then progressing to steatohepatitis and fibrosis and, ultimately, to HCC [49] (Fig.3). Thus, these two studies have convincingly shown a mechanistic connection between clock disruption and cancer development [49, 50]. In addition, microRNA miR-211, which suppresses Clock and Bmal1, also promotes tumor progression [162]. Targeting REV-ERBs is an effective strategy for combating cancer without altering the viability of normal cells or tissues. Using anticancer agonists of REV-ERBs (SR9009 and SR9011), Sulli et al. [58] were able to interfere with at least two cancer hallmarks: de novo lipogenesis and autophagy, which are important in meeting the metabolic demands of cancer cells.

Low oxygen levels in solid tumors stabilize hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs), which are transcription factors that acidify the tumor microenvironment. Recent research has shown that HIFs are capable of influencing various clock transcripts [163,164,165]. Furthermore, Walton et al. [166] showed that acidfication of the tumor microenvironment by hypoxic cells disrupts the circadian clock and rhythmic transcriptome. They showed that low pH suppresses mTORC1 (Mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1) signaling, causing inhibition of translation. The authors further found that restoring mTORC1 signaling, either by buffering against acidification or by inhibiting lactic acid production, fully rescues translation and clock oscillations [166]. Overall, recent research on circadian rhythms and cancer has given major insights into disease mechanisms, which will hopefully allow for improved treatments, possibly including circadian considerations.

Circadian rhythms in aging

Circadian rhythms seem to decline with age [167, 168], with neuronal activity rhythms displaying an age-dependent decline in the master clock in the SCN [169]. In addition, the disruption of circadian rhythms through the ablation of Bmal1 leads to premature aging in mice [84]. Recent studies of aged stem cells and liver suggest that circadian transcriptional profiles in aging cells are rewired. However, in contrast with what was predicted, aging does not simply cause dampened circadian rhythmicity in the expression of genes that cycle when animals are young. Instead, a new set of genes begin to cycle in aged mice [83, 170]. Aged epidermal and skeletal muscle stem cells show reprogramming of gene expression towards a stress response, inflammation, and DNA damage, with core clock genes maintaining their rhythms [83]. Thus, this study supports the idea that aged stem cells retain a functional clock, but that this clock redirects the cell into new circadian functions with age. Perhaps this reprogramming is associated with the differential DNA methylation that occurs with aging [171] (see below). The key pathways or molecules that lead to this rewiring of the circadian transcriptome with aging remain unknown.

Additional studies have brought to light extra layers of circadian regulation that appear to decline with age. Polyamines modulate multiple cellular functions, and altered polyamine metabolism is associated with aging. Zwighaft et al. [55] linked polyamine metabolism, the clock, and aging, showing that the circadian clock controls polyamine levels and, in turn, that polyamines regulate circadian period. Polyamines exert their effects by impacting the interaction between the circadian repressors PER2 and CRY1. Interestingly, the longer circadian period of aged mice can be shortened with polyamine supplementation in the drinking water [55]. Another layer of circadian regulation appears to be in the modification of cytosines in DNA. De novo DNA methylation is established by the DNA methyltransferases DNMT3A and DNMT3B, which transfer a methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine to a cytosine at a cytosine guanine (CpG) site. On the other hand, cytosine methylation marks can be removed through an active demethylation pathway involving oxidation performed by TET (ten eleven translocation) enzymes [171]. DNA methylation might affect gene regulation by changing nucleosome stability and altering the nucleosome structure. Recently, Oh et al. [172] reported that a large proportion of cytosines show a circadian pattern of methylation in mice, and that the mRNA levels of nearby genes are positively correlated with corresponding oscillations in DNA methylation in liver and lung tissues. Consistent with the decrease of circadian oscillation of certain transcripts with age, oscillatory cytosine modifications (and DNA methylation, in general) also appear to decrease in older animals [172].

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients frequently experience increased daytime sleep and night-time wakefulness [54]. AD is associated with the production and deposition of the β-amyloid (Aβ) peptide, and soluble Aβ levels exhibit robust daily oscillations in mouse hippocampal interstitial fluid [78, 173]. However, little is known about how circadian rhythms may influence AD [174]. In a recent study trying to address the role of the circadian clock in determining Aβ levels, Kress et al. [175] showed that Aβ rhythms are normal when Bmal1 is deleted in the brain and retained only in the SCN. Nevertheless, whole-brain Bmal1 deletion causes loss of Aβ interstitial fluid rhythms in the hippocampus and markedly increases amyloid plaque burden. In addition to Aβ oscillations, tau levels also fluctuate in the brain interstitial fluid of mice and in the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) of humans [54]. Tau levels appear to be higher during the animal’s active period and to increase when animals are subjected to sleep deprivation. Similarly, human CSF tau levels also increased by over 50% during sleep deprivation [54]. Finally, an interesting human cross-sectional study revealed an association between pre-clinical AD and disruption of the activity–rest rhythms. Specifically, pre-clinical amyloid plaques or higher CSF phosphorylated-tau to Aβ-42 ratios were associated with increased variability in daily behaviors, indicating fragmentation of activity–rest rhythms. The presence of abnormalities in circadian rhythms in pre-clinical AD suggests that circadian dysfunction could contribute to early pathogenesis or could serve as a biomarker of AD [176]. Together, these studies suggest that we should investigate the importance of a healthy sleep–wake cycle as an intervention for preventing AD and other tauopathies.

Implications for translation to therapy

Circadian research, in particular the concept of chrono-pharmacology, is increasingly shaping our view of future research and medicine [177, 178]. It has introduced a time component to our view of metabolism, inflammation, and host–pathogen interactions (among other interactions), and has shown that targeting genes that are cycling at specific times of day may be advantageous [179,180,181]. Recent characterizations of the circadian transcriptional profiles of non-human primates [153] and humans [46] across multiple tissues have complemented the circadian atlas previously obtained for mice [181]. These reports have strengthened an important conclusion from the rodent data—the potential for chrono-pharmacological treatment of multiple diseases. Most of the protein-coding genes that have been found to be oscillating in primates encode proteins that are identified as druggable targets by the US Food and Drug Administration.

Regarding infectious diseases, treatments, and vaccinations could be more effective when administered at specific times of day. Indeed, influenza vaccine administration in the morning has been shown to improve antibody response over afternoon vaccination response in people over 65 years old [182]. This shows the potential to align the timing of external interventions, such as drug treatment or vaccinations, to the phase of our internal defenses. A further aspect to take into consideration is the potential for the pathogen itself to have circadian rhythms, as is the case for the sleeping sickness parasite, Trypanosoma brucei. We recently showed that this parasite has intrinsic circadian rhythms that affect its sensitivity to suramin treatment [183]. This may be a common feature of pathogens, although this remains to be determined.

Pharmacological modulation of the circadian machinery may also be an effective therapy for cancer [58] and potentially for sleep and anxiety [184]. Our own studies on parasite–host interactions may help to identify factors that alter the period of the circadian clock [138]. If so, molecule(s) could potentially be used to accelerate the rhythms of both central and/or peripheral clocks, helping people to overcome jet lag or even improving symptoms in patients with DSPD. The fact that physiology is intimately linked with circadian rhythmicity raises the question of when to intervene in all human diseases, and if there is a particular time of the day when treatment would be more effective or whether modulating a key clock protein function could alleviate the pathology.

Conclusions and future directions

The past few years have been very exciting for circadian research, making it clear that circadian biology is at the core of animal physiology. A multitude of additional layers of circadian clock regulatory mechanisms have been demonstrated recently. Such additional layers of regulation of the circadian clock machinery include chromatin conformation and interactions [43, 56], polyamines [55], NADP+:NADPH redox ratio [185], cytosine modifications [172], and even autophagy [120]. Among those, the genomics of circadian rhythms have expanded our understanding of daily physiological rhythms in health [43, 88, 112] and disease [53, 162].

In addition to circadian rhythms, there are also biological rhythms with shorter (ultradian) periods. Clusters of ultradian genes that cycle with a 12-h period have been identified in several peripheral tissues in mice [181, 186], many of which respond to feeding [187]. Recently, it was proposed that the mechanism behind these 12-h rhythms is a cell-autonomous 12-h pacemaker that is important for maintaining metabolic homeostasis [188]. In the future, it will be interesting to see what other aspects of physiology are influenced by ultradian rhythms and how they integrate with circadian physiology.

Overall, we believe that the growing body of evidence in mammalian circadian rhythms research is revealing an undisputable link between circadian rhythms and human health. Nevertheless, we are far from understanding the complexity of circadian biology and medicine. Exciting new aspects continue to emerge in terms of health and lifespan, including dietary influences [189], as well as differences between genders [190]. Circadian medicine is clearly an interdisciplinary field that requires complementary expertise [57, 138, 175]. Advances in technology have shaped circadian research in recent years [43, 73, 112] and will continue to be crucial going forward. Integrating the temporal axis into human physiology and medicine offers an opportunity to optimize the alignment of our internal rhythms to the environment, which will provide new opportunities for lifestyle and pharmacological interventions to treat diseases and promote health.

Abbreviations

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

Aβ:

Amyloid β

BBB:

Blood–brain barrier

CNS:

Central nervous system

Cry1:

Cryptochrome 1

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

DHS:

DNase hypersensitive site

DIO:

Diet-induced obesity

DSPD:

Delayed sleep phase disorder

FASPD:

Familial advanced sleep phase disorder

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HIF:

Hypoxia-inducible factor

iKO:

Inducible knockout

IL-7R:

Interleukin-7 receptor

ipRGC:

Intrinsically photosensitive RGC

mTORC1:

Mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1

NOB:

Nobilitin

Pol II:

RNA polymerase II

PPARα:

Peroxisome proliferated activated receptor alpha

RGC:

Retinal ganglion cell

SCN:

Suprachiasmatic nucleus

SIK3:

Salt-inducible kinase 3

TSS:

Transcription start site

References

  1. 1.

    Konopka RJ, Benzer S. Clock mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971;68:2112–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Vitaterna MH, King DP, Chang AM, Kornhauser JM, Lowrey PL, McDonald JD, et al. Mutagenesis and mapping of a mouse gene, clock, essential for circadian behavior. Science. 1994;264:719–25.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    King DP, Zhao Y, Sangoram AM, Wilsbacher LD, Tanaka M, Antoch MP, et al. Positional cloning of the mouse circadian clock gene. Cell. 1997;89:641–53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    van der Horst GT, Muijtjens M, Kobayashi K, Takano R, Kanno S, Takao M, et al. Mammalian Cry1 and Cry2 are essential for maintenance of circadian rhythms. Nature. 1999;398:627–30.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bunger MK, Wilsbacher LD, Moran SM, Clendenin C, Radcliffe LA, Hogenesch JB, et al. Mop3 is an essential component of the master circadian pacemaker in mammals. Cell. 2000;103:1009–17.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Zheng B, Larkin DW, Albrecht U, Sun ZS, Sage M, Eichele G, et al. The mPer2 gene encodes a functional component of the mammalian circadian clock. Nature. 1999;400:169–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bae K, Jin X, Maywood ES, Hastings MH, Reppert SM, Weaver DR. Differential functions of mPer1, mPer2, and mPer3 in the SCN circadian clock. Neuron. 2001;30:525–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tei H, Okamura H, Shigeyoshi Y, Fukuhara C, Ozawa R, Hirose M, Sakaki Y. Circadian oscillation of a mammalian homologue of the Drosophila period gene. Nature. 1997;389:512–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Vitaterna MH, Selby CP, Todo T, Niwa H, Thompson C, Fruechte EM, et al. Differential regulation of mammalian period genes and circadian rhythmicity by cryptochromes 1 and 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:12114–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kume K, Zylka MJ, Sriram S, Shearman LP, Weaver DR, Jin X, et al. mCRY1 and mCRY2 are essential components of the negative limb of the circadian clock feedback loop. Cell. 1999;98:193–205.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gekakis N, Staknis D, Nguyen HB, Davis FC, Wilsbacher LD, King DP, et al. Role of the CLOCK protein in the mammalian circadian mechanism. Science. 1998;280:1564–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Schwartz WJ, Daan S. Origins: a brief account of the ancestry of circadian biology. In: Kumar V, editor. Biological timekeeping: clocks, rhythms and behaviour, vol. 1. New Delhi: Springer India; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Halberg F, Johnson EA, Brown BW, Bittner JJ. Susceptibility rhythm to E. coli endotoxin and bioassay. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1960;103:142–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Moore RY, Eichler VB. Loss of a circadian adrenal corticosterone rhythm following suprachiasmatic lesions in the rat. Brain Res. 1972;42:201–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Stephan FK, Zucker I. Circadian rhythms in drinking behavior and locomotor activity of rats are eliminated by hypothalamic lesions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972;69:1583–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Russell WL, Kelly EM, Hunsicker PR, Bangham JW, Maddux SC, Phipps EL. Specific-locus test shows ethylnitrosourea to be the most potent mutagen in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979;76:5818–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lehman MN, Silver R, Gladstone WR, Kahn RM, Gibson M, Bittman EL. Circadian rhythmicity restored by neural transplant. Immunocytochemical characterization of the graft and its integration with the host brain. J Neurosci. 1987;7:1626–38.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ralph MR, Foster RG, Davis FC, Menaker M. Transplanted suprachiasmatic nucleus determines circadian period. Science. 1990;247:975–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ralph MR, Menaker M. A mutation of the circadian system in golden hamsters. Science. 1988;241:1225–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Welsh DK, Logothetis DE, Meister M, Reppert SM. Individual neurons dissociated from rat suprachiasmatic nucleus express independently phased circadian firing rhythms. Neuron. 1995;14:697–706.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Shearman LP, Sriram S, Weaver DR, Maywood ES, Chaves I, Zheng B, et al. Interacting molecular loops in the mammalian circadian clock. Science. 2000;288:1013–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Balsalobre A, Damiola F, Schibler U. A serum shock induces circadian gene expression in mammalian tissue culture cells. Cell. 1998;93:929–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Yamazaki S, Numano R, Abe M, Hida A, Takahashi R, Ueda M, et al. Resetting central and peripheral circadian oscillators in transgenic rats. Science. 2000;288:682–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lowrey PL, Shimomura K, Antoch MP, Yamazaki S, Zemenides PD, Ralph MR, et al. Positional syntenic cloning and functional characterization of the mammalian circadian mutation tau. Science. 2000;288:483–92.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hattar S, Liao HW, Takao M, Berson DM, Yau KW. Melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells: architecture, projections, and intrinsic photosensitivity. Science. 2002;295:1065–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Berson DM, Dunn FA, Takao M. Phototransduction by retinal ganglion cells that set the circadian clock. Science. 2002;295:1070–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Provencio I, Rodriguez IR, Jiang G, Hayes WP, Moreira EF, Rollag MD. A novel human opsin in the inner retina. J Neurosci. 2000;20:600–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Toh KL, Jones CR, He Y, Eide EJ, Hinz WA, Virshup DM, et al. An hPer2 phosphorylation site mutation in familial advanced sleep phase syndrome. Science. 2001;291:1040–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Panda S, Antoch MP, Miller BH, Su AI, Schook AB, Straume M, et al. Coordinated transcription of key pathways in the mouse by the circadian clock. Cell. 2002;109:307–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ueda HR, Chen W, Adachi A, Wakamatsu H, Hayashi S, Takasugi T, et al. A transcription factor response element for gene expression during circadian night. Nature. 2002;418:534–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Storch KF, Lipan O, Leykin I, Viswanathan N, Davis FC, Wong WH, Weitz CJ. Extensive and divergent circadian gene expression in liver and heart. Nature. 2002;417:78–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Rudic RD, McNamara P, Curtis AM, Boston RC, Panda S, Hogenesch JB, Fitzgerald GA. BMAL1 and CLOCK, two essential components of the circadian clock, are involved in glucose homeostasis. PLoS Biol. 2004;2:e377.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Turek FW, Joshu C, Kohsaka A, Lin E, Ivanova G, McDearmon E, et al. Obesity and metabolic syndrome in circadian clock mutant mice. Science. 2005;308:1043–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    O'Neill JS, Reddy AB. Circadian clocks in human red blood cells. Nature. 2011;469:498–503.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Koike N, Yoo SH, Huang HC, Kumar V, Lee C, Kim TK, Takahashi JS. Transcriptional architecture and chromatin landscape of the core circadian clock in mammals. Science. 2012;338:349–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Vollmers C, Schmitz RJ, Nathanson J, Yeo G, Ecker JR, Panda S. Circadian oscillations of protein-coding and regulatory RNAs in a highly dynamic mammalian liver epigenome. Cell Metab. 2012;16:833–45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Rey G, Cesbron F, Rougemont J, Reinke H, Brunner M, Naef F. Genome-wide and phase-specific DNA-binding rhythms of BMAL1 control circadian output functions in mouse liver. PLoS Biol. 2011;9:e1000595.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Menet JS, Rodriguez J, Abruzzi KC, Rosbash M. Nascent-Seq reveals novel features of mouse circadian transcriptional regulation. Elife. 2012;1:e00011.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Gibbs JE, Blaikley J, Beesley S, Matthews L, Simpson KD, Boyce SH, et al. The nuclear receptor REV-ERBα mediates circadian regulation of innate immunity through selective regulation of inflammatory cytokines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:582–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Bellet MM, Deriu E, Liu JZ, Grimaldi B, Blaschitz C, Zeller M, et al. Circadian clock regulates the host response to Salmonella. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:9897–902.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Scheiermann C, Kunisaki Y, Lucas D, Chow A, Jang JE, Zhang D, et al. Adrenergic nerves govern circadian leukocyte recruitment to tissues. Immunity. 2012;37:290–301.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Yu X, Rollins D, Ruhn KA, Stubblefield JJ, Green CB, Kashiwada M, et al. TH17 cell differentiation is regulated by the circadian clock. Science. 2013;342:727–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Mermet J, Yeung J, Hurni C, Mauvoisin D, Gustafson K, Jouffe C, et al. Clock-dependent chromatin topology modulates circadian transcription and behavior. Genes Dev. 2018;32:347–58.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kim YH, Marhon SA, Zhang Y, Steger DJ, Won KJ, Lazar MA. Rev-erbα dynamically modulates chromatin looping to control circadian gene transcription. Science. 2018;359:1274–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Beytebiere JR, Trott AJ, Greenwell BJ, Osborne CA, Vitet H, Spence J, et al. Tissue-specific BMAL1 cistromes reveal that rhythmic transcription is associated with rhythmic enhancer–enhancer interactions. Genes Dev. 2019;33:294–309.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ruben MD, Wu G, Smith DF, Schmidt RE, Francey LJ, Lee YY, et al. A database of tissue-specific rhythmically expressed human genes has potential applications in circadian medicine. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10:doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aat8806.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Patke A, Murphy PJ, Onat OE, Krieger AC, Ozcelik T, Campbell SS, Young MW. Mutation of the human circadian clock gene CRY1 in familial delayed sleep phase disorder. Cell. 2017;169:203–15.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Hirano A, Shi G, Jones CR, Lipzen A, Pennacchio LA, Xu Y, et al. A Cryptochrome 2 mutation yields advanced sleep phase in human. Elife. 2016;5:doi: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16695.

  49. 49.

    Kettner NM, Voicu H, Finegold MJ, Coarfa C, Sreekumar A, Putluri N, et al. Circadian homeostasis of liver metabolism suppresses hepatocarcinogenesis. Cancer Cell. 2016;30:909–24.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Papagiannakopoulos T, Bauer MR, Davidson SM, Heimann M, Subbaraj L, Bhutkar A, et al. Circadian rhythm disruption promotes lung tumorigenesis. Cell Metab. 2016;24:324–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kiessling S, Dubeau-Laramee G, Ohm H, Labrecque N, Olivier M, Cermakian N. The circadian clock in immune cells controls the magnitude of Leishmania parasite infection. Sci Rep. 2017;7:10892.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Edgar RS, Stangherlin A, Nagy AD, Nicoll MP, Efstathiou S, O'Neill JS, Reddy AB. Cell autonomous regulation of herpes and influenza virus infection by the circadian clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:10085–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Guan D, Xiong Y, Borck PC, Jang C, Doulias PT, Papazyan R, et al. Diet-induced circadian enhancer remodeling synchronizes opposing hepatic lipid metabolic processes. Cell. 2018;174:831–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Holth JK, Fritschi SK, Wang C, Pedersen NP, Cirrito JR, Mahan TE, et al. The sleep-wake cycle regulates brain interstitial fluid tau in mice and CSF tau in humans. Science. 2019;363:880–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Zwighaft Z, Aviram R, Shalev M, Rousso-Noori L, Kraut-Cohen J, Golik M, et al. Circadian clock control by polyamine levels through a mechanism that declines with age. Cell Metab. 2015;22:874–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Takahashi JS. Transcriptional architecture of the mammalian circadian clock. Nat Rev Genet. 2017;18:164–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Winter C, Silvestre-Roig C, Ortega-Gomez A, Lemnitzer P, Poelman H, Schumski A, et al. Chrono-pharmacological targeting of the CCL2–CCR2 axis ameliorates atherosclerosis. Cell Metab. 2018;28:175–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Sulli G, Rommel A, Wang X, Kolar MJ, Puca F, Saghatelian A, et al. Pharmacological activation of REV-ERBs is lethal in cancer and oncogene-induced senescence. Nature. 2018;553:351–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Kojima S, Shingle DL, Green CB. Post-transcriptional control of circadian rhythms. J Cell Sci. 2011;124:311–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Mehra A, Baker CL, Loros JJ, Dunlap JC. Post-translational modifications in circadian rhythms. Trends Biochem Sci. 2009;34:483–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Fang B, Everett LJ, Jager J, Briggs E, Armour SM, Feng D, et al. Circadian enhancers coordinate multiple phases of rhythmic gene transcription in vivo. Cell. 2014;159:1140–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Le Martelot G, Canella D, Symul L, Migliavacca E, Gilardi F, Liechti R, et al. Genome-wide RNA polymerase II profiles and RNA accumulation reveal kinetics of transcription and associated epigenetic changes during diurnal cycles. PLoS Biol. 2012;10:e1001442.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Aguilar-Arnal L, Hakim O, Patel VR, Baldi P, Hager GL, Sassone-Corsi P. Cycles in spatial and temporal chromosomal organization driven by the circadian clock. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013;20:1206–13.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Chen H, Chen J, Muir LA, Ronquist S, Meixner W, Ljungman M, et al. Functional organization of the human 4D Nucleome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:8002–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Xu Y, Guo W, Li P, Zhang Y, Zhao M, Fan Z, et al. Long-range chromosome interactions mediated by cohesin shape circadian gene expression. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1005992.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Zhao H, Sifakis EG, Sumida N, Millan-Arino L, Scholz BA, Svensson JP, et al. PARP1- and CTCF-mediated interactions between active and repressed chromatin at the lamina promote oscillating transcription. Mol Cell. 2015;59:984–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Perelis M, Marcheva B, Ramsey KM, Schipma MJ, Hutchison AL, Taguchi A, et al. Pancreatic β cell enhancers regulate rhythmic transcription of genes controlling insulin secretion. Science. 2015;350:aac4250.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Sobel JA, Krier I, Andersin T, Raghav S, Canella D, Gilardi F, et al. Transcriptional regulatory logic of the diurnal cycle in the mouse liver. PLoS Biol. 2017;15:e2001069.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Yeung J, Mermet J, Jouffe C, Marquis J, Charpagne A, Gachon F, Naef F. Transcription factor activity rhythms and tissue-specific chromatin interactions explain circadian gene expression across organs. Genome Res. 2018;28:182–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Reddy AB, Karp NA, Maywood ES, Sage EA, Deery M, O'Neill JS, et al. Circadian orchestration of the hepatic proteome. Curr Biol. 2006;16:1107–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Robles MS, Cox J, Mann M. In-vivo quantitative proteomics reveals a key contribution of post-transcriptional mechanisms to the circadian regulation of liver metabolism. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004047.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Wang J, Mauvoisin D, Martin E, Atger F, Galindo AN, Dayon L, et al. Nuclear proteomics uncovers diurnal regulatory landscapes in mouse liver. Cell Metab. 2017;25:102–17.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Robles MS, Humphrey SJ, Mann M. Phosphorylation is a central mechanism for circadian control of metabolism and physiology. Cell Metab. 2017;25:118–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Vanselow K, Vanselow JT, Westermark PO, Reischl S, Maier B, Korte T, et al. Differential effects of PER2 phosphorylation: molecular basis for the human familial advanced sleep phase syndrome (FASPS). Genes Dev. 2006;20:2660–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Xu Y, Padiath QS, Shapiro RE, Jones CR, Wu SC, Saigoh N, et al. Functional consequences of a CKIdelta mutation causing familial advanced sleep phase syndrome. Nature. 2005;434:640–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Lewy AJ, Sack RL, Miller LS, Hoban TM. Antidepressant and circadian phase-shifting effects of light. Science. 1987;235:352–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Gordijn MC, Beersma DG, Bouhuys AL, Reinink E, Van den Hoofdakker RH. A longitudinal study of diurnal mood variation in depression; characteristics and significance. J Affect Disord. 1994;31:261–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Kang JE, Lim MM, Bateman RJ, Lee JJ, Smyth LP, Cirrito JR, et al. Amyloid-beta dynamics are regulated by orexin and the sleep-wake cycle. Science. 2009;326:1005–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Ng TH, Chung KF, Ho FY, Yeung WF, Yung KP, Lam TH. Sleep-wake disturbance in interepisode bipolar disorder and high-risk individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. 2015;20:46–58.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Pagani L, St Clair PA, Teshiba TM, Service SK, Fears SC, Araya C, et al. Genetic contributions to circadian activity rhythm and sleep pattern phenotypes in pedigrees segregating for severe bipolar disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;13:E754–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Bahrami-Nejad Z, Zhao ML, Tholen S, Hunerdosse D, Tkach KE, van Schie S, et al. A transcriptional circuit filters oscillating circadian hormonal inputs to regulate fat cell differentiation. Cell Metab. 2018;27:854–68.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Paschos GK, FitzGerald GA. Circadian clocks and vascular function. Circ Res. 2010;106:833–41.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Solanas G, Peixoto FO, Perdiguero E, Jardi M, Ruiz-Bonilla V, Datta D, et al. Aged stem cells reprogram their daily rhythmic functions to adapt to stress. Cell. 2017;170:678–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Kondratov RV, Kondratova AA, Gorbacheva VY, Vykhovanets OV, Antoch MP. Early aging and age-related pathologies in mice deficient in BMAL1, the core component of the circadian clock. Genes Dev. 2006;20:1868–73.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Wang Y, Kuang Z, Yu X, Ruhn KA, Kubo M, Hooper LV. The intestinal microbiota regulates body composition through NFIL3 and the circadian clock. Science. 2017;357:912–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Zee PC, Attarian H, Videnovic A. Circadian rhythm abnormalities. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2013;19(1 Sleep Disorders):132–47. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.CON.0000427209.21177.aa.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Jagannath A, Taylor L, Wakaf Z, Vasudevan SR, Foster RG. The genetics of circadian rhythms, sleep and health. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26:R128–38.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Jones SE, Lane JM, Wood AR, van Hees VT, Tyrrell J, Beaumont RN, et al. Genome-wide association analyses of chronotype in 697,828 individuals provides insights into circadian rhythms. Nat Commun. 2019;10:343.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Hayasaka N, Hirano A, Miyoshi Y, Tokuda IT, Yoshitane H, Matsuda J, Fukada Y. Salt-inducible kinase 3 regulates the mammalian circadian clock by destabilizing PER2 protein. Elife. 2017;6. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24779.

  90. 90.

    Funato H, Miyoshi C, Fujiyama T, Kanda T, Sato M, Wang Z, et al. Forward-genetics analysis of sleep in randomly mutagenized mice. Nature. 2016;539:378–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Karlsson B, Knutsson A, Lindahl B. Is there an association between shift work and having a metabolic syndrome? Results from a population based study of 27,485 people. Occup Environ Med. 2001;58:747–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Zhang EE, Liu Y, Dentin R, Pongsawakul PY, Liu AC, Hirota T, et al. Cryptochrome mediates circadian regulation of cAMP signaling and hepatic gluconeogenesis. Nat Med. 2010;16:1152–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Jang H, Lee GY, Selby CP, Lee G, Jeon YG, Lee JH, et al. SREBP1c-CRY1 signalling represses hepatic glucose production by promoting FOXO1 degradation during refeeding. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12180.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Lamia KA, Papp SJ, Yu RT, Barish GD, Uhlenhaut NH, Jonker JW, et al. Cryptochromes mediate rhythmic repression of the glucocorticoid receptor. Nature. 2011;480:552–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Grimaldi B, Bellet MM, Katada S, Astarita G, Hirayama J, Amin RH, et al. PER2 controls lipid metabolism by direct regulation of PPARγ. Cell Metab. 2010;12:509–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Neufeld-Cohen A, Robles MS, Aviram R, Manella G, Adamovich Y, Ladeuix B, et al. Circadian control of oscillations in mitochondrial rate-limiting enzymes and nutrient utilization by PERIOD proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:E1673–82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Cho H, Zhao X, Hatori M, Yu RT, Barish GD, Lam MT, et al. Regulation of circadian behaviour and metabolism by REV-ERB-α and REV-ERB-β. Nature. 2012;485:123–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Panda S. Circadian physiology of metabolism. Science. 2016;354:1008–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Marcheva B, Ramsey KM, Buhr ED, Kobayashi Y, Su H, Ko CH, et al. Disruption of the CLOCK components CLOCK and BMAL1 leads to hypoinsulinaemia and diabetes. Nature. 2010;466:627–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Shimba S, Ishii N, Ohta Y, Ohno T, Watabe Y, Hayashi M, et al. Brain and muscle Arnt-like protein-1 (BMAL1), a component of the molecular clock, regulates adipogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:12071–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Stubblefield JJ, Gao P, Kilaru G, Mukadam B, Terrien J, Green CB. Temporal control of metabolic amplitude by Nocturnin. Cell Rep. 2018;22:1225–35.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Dyar KA, Lutter D, Artati A, Ceglia NJ, Liu Y, Armenta D, et al. Atlas of circadian metabolism reveals system-wide coordination and communication between clocks. Cell. 2018;174:1571–85.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Froy O. Metabolism and circadian rhythms—implications for obesity. Endocr Rev. 2010;31:1–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Kinouchi K, Magnan C, Ceglia N, Liu Y, Cervantes M, Pastore N, et al. Fasting imparts a switch to alternative daily pathways in liver and muscle. Cell Rep. 2018;25:3299–314.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Hatori M, Vollmers C, Zarrinpar A, Ditacchio L, Bushong EA, Gill S, et al. Time-restricted feeding without reducing caloric intake prevents metabolic diseases in mice fed a high-fat diet. Cell Metab. 2012;15:848–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Chaix A, Zarrinpar A, Miu P, Panda S. Time-restricted feeding is a preventative and therapeutic intervention against diverse nutritional challenges. Cell Metab. 2014;20:991–1005.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Longo VD, Panda S. Fasting, circadian rhythms, and time-restricted feeding in healthy lifespan. Cell Metab. 2016;23:1048–59.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Mukherji A, Kobiita A, Damara M, Misra N, Meziane H, Champy MF, Chambon P. Shifting eating to the circadian rest phase misaligns the peripheral clocks with the master SCN clock and leads to a metabolic syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:E6691–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Mukherji A, Kobiita A, Chambon P. Shifting the feeding of mice to the rest phase creates metabolic alterations, which, on their own, shift the peripheral circadian clocks by 12 hours. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:E6683–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Damiola F, Le Minh N, Preitner N, Kornmann B, Fleury-Olela F, Schibler U. Restricted feeding uncouples circadian oscillators in peripheral tissues from the central pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Genes Dev. 2000;14:2950–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Acosta-Rodriguez VA, de Groot MHM, Rijo-Ferreira F, Green CB, Takahashi JS. Mice under caloric restriction self-impose a temporal restriction of food intake as revealed by an automated feeder system. Cell Metab. 2017;26:267–77.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Cedernaes J, Huang W, Ramsey KM, Waldeck N, Cheng L, Marcheva B, et al. Transcriptional basis for rhythmic control of hunger and metabolism within the AgRP neuron. Cell Metab. 2019;29:1078–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Eckel-Mahan KL, Patel VR, de Mateo S, Orozco-Solis R, Ceglia NJ, Sahar S, et al. Reprogramming of the circadian clock by nutritional challenge. Cell. 2013;155:1464–78.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Kohsaka A, Laposky AD, Ramsey KM, Estrada C, Joshu C, Kobayashi Y, et al. High-fat diet disrupts behavioral and molecular circadian rhythms in mice. Cell Metab. 2007;6:414–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Chen Z, Yoo SH, Park YS, Kim KH, Wei S, Buhr E, et al. Identification of diverse modulators of central and peripheral circadian clocks by high-throughput chemical screening. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:101–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Chen Z, Yoo SH, Takahashi JS. Development and therapeutic potential of small-molecule modulators of circadian systems. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018;58:231–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    He B, Nohara K, Park N, Park YS, Guillory B, Zhao Z, et al. The small molecule nobiletin targets the molecular oscillator to enhance circadian rhythms and protect against metabolic syndrome. Cell Metab. 2016;23:610–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Lightman SL, Conway-Campbell BL. The crucial role of pulsatile activity of the HPA axis for continuous dynamic equilibration. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11:710–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Lee MJ, Pramyothin P, Karastergiou K, Fried SK. Deconstructing the roles of glucocorticoids in adipose tissue biology and the development of central obesity. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1842;2014:473–81.

    Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Toledo M, Batista-Gonzalez A, Merheb E, Aoun ML, Tarabra E, Feng D, et al. Autophagy regulates the liver clock and glucose metabolism by degrading CRY1. Cell Metab. 2018;28:268–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Scheiermann C, Gibbs J, Ince L, Loudon A. Clocking in to immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18:423–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Nguyen KD, Fentress SJ, Qiu Y, Yun K, Cox JS, Chawla A. Circadian gene Bmal1 regulates diurnal oscillations of Ly6C(hi) inflammatory monocytes. Science. 2013;341:1483–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Suzuki K, Hayano Y, Nakai A, Furuta F, Noda M. Adrenergic control of the adaptive immune response by diurnal lymphocyte recirculation through lymph nodes. J Exp Med. 2016;213:2567–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Shimba A, Cui G, Tani-Ichi S, Ogawa M, Abe S, Okazaki F, et al. Glucocorticoids drive diurnal oscillations in T cell distribution and responses by inducing interleukin-7 receptor and CXCR4. Immunity. 2018;48:286–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Druzd D, Matveeva O, Ince L, Harrison U, He W, Schmal C, et al. Lymphocyte circadian clocks control lymph node trafficking and adaptive immune responses. Immunity. 2017;46:120–2.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Besedovsky L, Born J, Lange T. Endogenous glucocorticoid receptor signaling drives rhythmic changes in human T-cell subset numbers and the expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4. FASEB J. 2014;28:67–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Abe A, Tani-ichi S, Shitara S, Cui G, Yamada H, Miyachi H, et al. An enhancer of the IL-7 receptor α-chain locus controls IL-7 receptor expression and maintenance of peripheral T cells. J Immunol. 2015;195:3129–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Curtis AM, Bellet MM, Sassone-Corsi P, O'Neill LA. Circadian clock proteins and immunity. Immunity. 2014;40:178–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Curtis AM, Fagundes CT, Yang G, Palsson-McDermott EM, Wochal P, McGettrick AF, et al. Circadian control of innate immunity in macrophages by miR-155 targeting Bmal1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:7231–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Sutton CE, Finlay CM, Raverdeau M, Early JO, DeCourcey J, Zaslona Z, et al. Loss of the molecular clock in myeloid cells exacerbates T cell-mediated CNS autoimmune disease. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1923.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Early JO, Menon D, Wyse CA, Cervantes-Silva MP, Zaslona Z, Carroll RG, et al. Circadian clock protein BMAL1 regulates IL-1β in macrophages via NRF2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:E8460–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Zhao Y, Liu M, Chan XY, Tan SY, Subramaniam S, Fan Y, et al. Uncovering the mystery of opposite circadian rhythms between mouse and human leukocytes in humanized mice. Blood. 2017;130:1995–2005.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Zaslona Z, Palsson-McDermott EM, Menon D, Haneklaus M, Flis E, Prendeville H, et al. The induction of pro-IL-1β by lipopolysaccharide requires endogenous prostaglandin E2 production. J Immunol. 2017;198:3558–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Hopwood TW, Hall S, Begley N, Forman R, Brown S, Vonslow R, et al. The circadian regulator BMAL1 programmes responses to parasitic worm infection via a dendritic cell clock. Sci Rep. 2018;8:3782.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Majumdar T, Dhar J, Patel S, Kondratov R, Barik S. Circadian transcription factor BMAL1 regulates innate immunity against select RNA viruses. Innate Immun. 2017;23:147–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Ehlers A, Xie W, Agapov E, Brown S, Steinberg D, Tidwell R, et al. BMAL1 links the circadian clock to viral airway pathology and asthma phenotypes. Mucosal Immunol. 2018;11:97–111.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Fernandez Alfonso T, Celentano AM, Gonzalez Cappa SM, Golombek DA. The circadian system of Trypanosoma cruzi-infected mice. Chronobiol Int. 2003;20:49–64.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Rijo-Ferreira F, Carvalho T, Afonso C, Sanches-Vaz M, Costa RM, Figueiredo LM, Takahashi JS. Sleeping sickness is a circadian disorder. Nat Commun. 2018;9:62.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Cavadini G, Petrzilka S, Kohler P, Jud C, Tobler I, Birchler T, Fontana A. TNF-alpha suppresses the expression of clock genes by interfering with E-box-mediated transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:12843–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Rijo-Ferreira F, Takahashi JS, Figueiredo LM. Circadian rhythms in parasites. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13:e1006590.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Thaiss CA, Zeevi D, Levy M, Zilberman-Schapira G, Suez J, Tengeler AC, et al. Transkingdom control of microbiota diurnal oscillations promotes metabolic homeostasis. Cell. 2014;159:514–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Thaiss CA, Levy M, Korem T, Dohnalova L, Shapiro H, Jaitin DA, et al. Microbiota diurnal rhythmicity programs host transcriptome oscillations. Cell. 2016;167:1495–510.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Leone V, Gibbons SM, Martinez K, Hutchison AL, Huang EY, Cham CM, et al. Effects of diurnal variation of gut microbes and high-fat feeding on host circadian clock function and metabolism. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17:681–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Godinho-Silva C, Domingues RG, Rendas M, Raposo B, Ribeiro H, da Silva JA, et al. Light-entrained and brain-tuned circadian circuits regulate ILC3s and gut homeostasis. Nature. 2019;574:254–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Montaigne D, Marechal X, Modine T, Coisne A, Mouton S, Fayad G, et al. Daytime variation of perioperative myocardial injury in cardiac surgery and its prevention by rev-Erbα antagonism: a single-Centre propensity-matched cohort study and a randomised study. Lancet. 2018;391:59–69.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Curtis AM, Cheng Y, Kapoor S, Reilly D, Price TS, Fitzgerald GA. Circadian variation of blood pressure and the vascular response to asynchronous stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:3450–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Sitaula S, Billon C, Kamenecka TM, Solt LA, Burris TP. Suppression of atherosclerosis by synthetic REV-ERB agonist. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;460:566–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Huo M, Huang Y, Qu D, Zhang H, Wong WT, Chawla A, et al. Myeloid Bmal1 deletion increases monocyte recruitment and worsens atherosclerosis. FASEB J. 2017;31:1097–106.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Yang G, Chen L, Grant GR, Paschos G, Song WL, Musiek ES, et al. Timing of expression of the core clock gene Bmal1 influences its effects on aging and survival. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8:324ra316.

    Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Brancaccio M, Patton AP, Chesham JE, Maywood ES, Hastings MH. Astrocytes control circadian timekeeping in the suprachiasmatic nucleus via glutamatergic signaling. Neuron. 2017;93:1420–35.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Tso CF, Simon T, Greenlaw AC, Puri T, Mieda M, Herzog ED. Astrocytes regulate daily rhythms in the suprachiasmatic nucleus and behavior. Curr Biol. 2017;27:1055–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Brancaccio M, Edwards MD, Patton AP, Smyllie NJ, Chesham JE, Maywood ES, Hastings MH. Cell-autonomous clock of astrocytes drives circadian behavior in mammals. Science. 2019;363:187–92.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Mure LS, Le HD, Benegiamo G, Chang MW, Rios L, Jillani N, et al. Diurnal transcriptome atlas of a primate across major neural and peripheral tissues. Science. 2018;359. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0318.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Nakazato R, Kawabe K, Yamada D, Ikeno S, Mieda M, Shimba S, et al. Disruption of Bmal1 impairs blood–brain barrier integrity via pericyte dysfunction. J Neurosci. 2017;37:10052–62.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  155. 155.

    Zhang SL, Yue Z, Arnold DM, Artiushin G, Sehgal A. A circadian clock in the blood–brain barrier regulates xenobiotic efflux. Cell. 2018;173:130–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    LeGates TA, Fernandez DC, Hattar S. Light as a central modulator of circadian rhythms, sleep and affect. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15:443–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Fernandez DC, Fogerson PM, Lazzerini Ospri L, Thomsen MB, Layne RM, Severin D, et al. Light affects mood and learning through distinct retina-brain pathways. Cell. 2018;175:71–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Fu L, Kettner NM. The circadian clock in cancer development and therapy. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2013;119:221–82.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Fu L, Lee CC. The circadian clock: pacemaker and tumour suppressor. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:350–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Yu EA, Weaver DR. Disrupting the circadian clock: gene-specific effects on aging, cancer, and other phenotypes. Aging (Albany NY). 2011;3:479–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Altman BJ, Hsieh AL, Sengupta A, Krishnanaiah SY, Stine ZE, Walton ZE, et al. MYC disrupts the circadian clock and metabolism in cancer cells. Cell Metab. 2015;22:1009–19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    Bu Y, Yoshida A, Chitnis N, Altman BJ, Tameire F, Oran A, et al. A PERK-miR-211 axis suppresses circadian regulators and protein synthesis to promote cancer cell survival. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20:104–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  163. 163.

    Peek CB, Levine DC, Cedernaes J, Taguchi A, Kobayashi Y, Tsai SJ, et al. Circadian clock interaction with HIF1α mediates oxygenic metabolism and anaerobic glycolysis in skeletal muscle. Cell Metab. 2017;25:86–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    Wu Y, Tang D, Liu N, Xiong W, Huang H, Li Y, et al. Reciprocal regulation between the circadian clock and hypoxia signaling at the genome level in mammals. Cell Metab. 2017;25:73–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  165. 165.

    Adamovich Y, Ladeuix B, Golik M, Koeners MP, Asher G. Rhythmic oxygen levels reset circadian clocks through HIF1α. Cell Metab. 2017;25:93–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  166. 166.

    Walton ZE, Patel CH, Brooks RC, Yu Y, Ibrahim-Hashim A, Riddle M, et al. Acid suspends the circadian clock in hypoxia through inhibition of mTOR. Cell. 2018;174:72–87.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  167. 167.

    Kondratova AA, Kondratov RV. The circadian clock and pathology of the ageing brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13:325–35.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  168. 168.

    Chen CY, Logan RW, Ma T, Lewis DA, Tseng GC, Sibille E, McClung CA. Effects of aging on circadian patterns of gene expression in the human prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:206–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  169. 169.

    Nakamura TJ, Nakamura W, Yamazaki S, Kudo T, Cutler T, Colwell CS, Block GD. Age-related decline in circadian output. J Neurosci. 2011;31:10201–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  170. 170.

    Sato S, Solanas G, Peixoto FO, Bee L, Symeonidi A, Schmidt MS, et al. Circadian reprogramming in the liver identifies metabolic pathways of aging. Cell. 2017;170:664–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  171. 171.

    Horvath S, Raj K. DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19:371–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  172. 172.

    Oh G, Ebrahimi S, Carlucci M, Zhang A, Nair A, Groot DE, et al. Cytosine modifications exhibit circadian oscillations that are involved in epigenetic diversity and aging. Nat Commun. 2018;9:644.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  173. 173.

    Roh JH, Huang Y, Bero AW, Kasten T, Stewart FR, Bateman RJ, Holtzman DM. Disruption of the sleep-wake cycle and diurnal fluctuation of β-amyloid in mice with Alzheimer's disease pathology. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:150ra122.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  174. 174.

    Hastings MH, Goedert M. Circadian clocks and neurodegenerative diseases: time to aggregate? Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013;23:880–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  175. 175.

    Kress GJ, Liao F, Dimitry J, Cedeno MR, FitzGerald GA, Holtzman DM, Musiek ES. Regulation of amyloid-β dynamics and pathology by the circadian clock. J Exp Med. 2018;215:1059–68.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  176. 176.

    Musiek ES, Bhimasani M, Zangrilli MA, Morris JC, Holtzman DM, Ju YS. Circadian rest-activity pattern changes in aging and preclinical Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75:582–90.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  177. 177.

    Ruben MD, Smith DF, FitzGerald GA, Hogenesch JB. Dosing time matters. Science. 2019;365:547–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  178. 178.

    Cederroth CR, Albrecht U, Bass J, Brown SA, Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen J, Gachon F, et al. Medicine in the fourth dimension. Cell Metab. 2019;30:238–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  179. 179.

    Anafi RC, Francey LJ, Hogenesch JB, Kim J. CYCLOPS reveals human transcriptional rhythms in health and disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:5312–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  180. 180.

    Selfridge JM, Gotoh T, Schiffhauer S, Liu J, Stauffer PE, Li A, et al. Chronotherapy: intuitive, sound, founded...but not broadly applied. Drugs. 2016;76:1507–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  181. 181.

    Zhang R, Lahens NF, Ballance HI, Hughes ME, Hogenesch JB. A circadian gene expression atlas in mammals: implications for biology and medicine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:16219–24.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  182. 182.

    Long JE, Drayson MT, Taylor AE, Toellner KM, Lord JM, Phillips AC. Morning vaccination enhances antibody response over afternoon vaccination: a cluster-randomised trial. Vaccine. 2016;34:2679–85.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  183. 183.

    Rijo-Ferreira F, Pinto-Neves D, Barbosa-Morais NL, Takahashi JS, Figueiredo LM. Trypanosoma brucei metabolism is under circadian control. Nat Microbiol. 2017;2:17032.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  184. 184.

    Banerjee S, Wang Y, Solt LA, Griffett K, Kazantzis M, Amador A, et al. Pharmacological targeting of the mammalian clock regulates sleep architecture and emotional behaviour. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5759.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  185. 185.

    Rey G, Valekunja UK, Feeney KA, Wulund L, Milev NB, Stangherlin A, et al. The pentose phosphate pathway regulates the circadian clock. Cell Metab. 2016;24:462–73.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  186. 186.

    Hughes ME, DiTacchio L, Hayes KR, Vollmers C, Pulivarthy S, Baggs JE, et al. Harmonics of circadian gene transcription in mammals. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000442.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  187. 187.

    Vollmers C, Gill S, DiTacchio L, Pulivarthy SR, Le HD, Panda S. Time of feeding and the intrinsic circadian clock drive rhythms in hepatic gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:21453–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  188. 188.

    Zhu B, Zhang Q, Pan Y, Mace EM, York B, Antoulas AC, et al. A cell-autonomous mammalian 12 hr clock coordinates metabolic and stress rhythms. Cell Metab. 2017;25:1305–19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  189. 189.

    Di Francesco A, Di Germanio C, Bernier M, de Cabo R. A time to fast. Science. 2018;362:770–5.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  190. 190.

    Liang X, Bushman FD, FitzGerald GA. Rhythmicity of the intestinal microbiota is regulated by gender and the host circadian clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:10479–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are most grateful to Kimberly Cox, Jeremy Stubblefield, and Yue Zhang for critical reading and proofreading of the manuscript and to Fernando Augusto for the design of the figures. Apologies to those whose work was not cited because of content and length constraints.

Funding

This work was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. JST is an investigator and FR-F is an associate in the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390-9111, USA

    Filipa Rijo-Ferreira & Joseph S. Takahashi

  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390-9111, USA

    Filipa Rijo-Ferreira & Joseph S. Takahashi

Authors
  1. Filipa Rijo-Ferreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joseph S. Takahashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FR-F and JST wrote the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph S. Takahashi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rijo-Ferreira, F., Takahashi, J.S. Genomics of circadian rhythms in health and disease. Genome Med 11, 82 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0704-0

Download citation

Genome Medicine

ISSN: 1756-994X

Contact us