Skip to main content

A map of human microRNA variation uncovers unexpectedly high levels of variability



MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are key components of the gene regulatory network in many species. During the past few years, these regulatory elements have been shown to be involved in an increasing number and range of diseases. Consequently, the compilation of a comprehensive map of natural variability in a healthy population seems an obvious requirement for future research on miRNA-related pathologies.


Data on 14 populations from the 1000 Genomes Project were analyzed, along with new data extracted from 60 exomes of healthy individuals from a population from southern Spain, sequenced in the context of the Medical Genome Project, to derive an accurate map of miRNA variability.


Despite the common belief that miRNAs are highly conserved elements, analysis of the sequences of the 1,152 individuals indicated that the observed level of variability is double what was expected. A total of 527 variants were found. Among these, 45 variants affected the recognition region of the corresponding miRNA and were found in 43 different miRNAs, 26 of which are known to be involved in 57 diseases. Different parts of the mature structure of the miRNA were affected to different degrees by variants, which suggests the existence of a selective pressure related to the relative functional impact of the change. Moreover, 41 variants showed a significant deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, which supports the existence of a selective process against some alleles. The average number of variants per individual in miRNAs was 28.


Despite an expectation that miRNAs would be highly conserved genomic elements, our study reports a level of variability comparable to that observed for coding genes.


Among the non-coding RNA elements, microRNAs (miRNAs) constitute a class of relevant functional and regulatory factors. miRNAs are short non-coding RNAs approximately 22 nucleotides long that play an important role as post-transcriptional regulators [1]. These trans-acting factors regulate mRNA functionality by modulating both mRNA stability and the translation of mRNA into protein [2, 3]. Some estimates suggest that a relatively large amount of the genes in the human genome (which might comprise up to the 4%) could effectively code for miRNAs. Such regulatory elements present a broad range of targets: it is believed that a single miRNA can regulate the expression of as many as 200 genes [4]. Numerous studies have involved miRNAs in a large number of key biological processes, such as cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, development, and so on [57]. As an obvious consequence of this, miRNA deregulation has been associated with a large number of diseases, including cancers, psychiatric and neurological diseases, and so on [8]. As in other functionally relevant elements, and especially due to their crucial regulatory role based on base complementarity, few mutations are expected to occur in miRNAs. Actually, most mutations of the miRNA sequence are expected to have adverse effects on their functionality or biogenesis [9]. Early studies on variability of miRNAs using SNPs reported a very low level of variation in their functional regions [10]. The absence of polymorphisms in more than 90% of human pre-miRNAs has been reported. Moreover, most of the observed polymorphisms occurred outside the seed region, suggesting the existence of a strong selective constraint on human pre-miRNAs [10]. Even common variants located in miRNAs seem to have effects on susceptibility to diseases such as cancer [11, 12], ulcerative colitis [13] and many others [8]. SNP genotype data were also used to study the variability at miRNA binding sites. Different authors have also reported a significantly low variation at these sites, thus providing independent support for the notion of high conservation of the miRNA regulatory network [10, 14].

The recent publication of the 1000 Genomes Project has revealed an enormous amount of variation at the genome level [15]. An interesting aspect that can be studied from a population perspective is the occurrence of variations across the different genomic features. In particular, variants predicted to severely affect the function of human protein-coding genes, known as loss-of-function (LOF) variants, have attracted the attention of many researchers [15]. Such variants are thought to have a potential deleterious effect and have traditionally been associated with severe Mendelian diseases. However, recent genome sequencing projects have revealed an unexpectedly large number of these variants in the genomes of apparently healthy individuals. A conservative estimate suggests that there are at least 250 LOF variants per sequenced genome, 100 of them involved in known human diseases, and more than 30 in a homozygous state, which suggests a previously unnoticed level of variation with putative functional consequences in protein coding regions in humans [16].

Therefore, it seems urgent to produce a comprehensive catalogue of the natural variation of miRNAs in order to discriminate between pathogenic and non-pathogenic variants in further studies. It is important to check whether a restrictive scenario for the existence of variation is confirmed or, on the contrary, a scenario of variation similar to that observed with coding genes also occurs in miRNAs. In order to distinguish between these two possibilities, we have analyzed the miRNA sequences of 1,152 individuals to survey the actual levels of variability at these genomic elements. The samples belong to 14 populations distributed worldwide, completed with sequencing data corresponding to 60 exomes from the Medical Genome Project [17]. Our analysis discovered a significant number of variants, 527, affecting not only the pre-processed miRNA but also the mature miRNAs. Still, a considerable number of these variants (over 35%) have not yet been reported in dbSNP [18]. The variants found affect different miRNAs known to be involved in 57 diseases. Actually, 41 variants showed a significant deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE), suggesting that selective pressure might be acting against them.

Materials and methods

miRNA data sources

miRNAs and their chromosomal coordinates were obtained from miRBase [4] release 18. The regions within miRNAs were defined as in Figure 1 (bottom). The seed region comprising nucleotides 2 to 8 in Figure 1 is a well-known feature of miRNAs [19, 20], although recent work extends the region to nucleotide 1 [21]. The definition of the miRNA duplex, including the rest of the elements (pre-mir and the rest of the miR 5' and 3' as well as the loop) was also taken from the literature [22, 23]. The associations of miRNAs to diseases were taken from the PhenomiR database [24].

Figure 1
figure 1

Structure of a pre-miRNA, an miRNA precursor. Top: distribution of all the variants observed in all the populations analyzed across the different substructures of the pre-miRNA. Bottom: the theoretical pre-miRNA. The mature miRNA is composed of the seed miR 5' and the rest of miR 5' (and the other mature miRNA is the same for the 3').

Human populations

Fourteen human populations were used in this study: the European populations TSI (from Toscani in Italia; 98 samples), FIN (Finnish from Finland; 93 samples), GBR (British from England and Scotland; 89 samples), CEU (Utah residents (CEPH collection) with Northern and Western European ancestry; 85 samples) and IBS (Iberian populations in Spain; 14 samples); the Asian populations CHB (Han Chinese in Beijing, China; 97 samples), CHS (Han Chinese South; 100 samples) and JPT (Japanese in Toyko, Japan; 89 samples); the American populations MXL (Mexican Ancestry in Los Angeles, CA; 66 samples), PUR (Puerto Rican in Puerto Rico; 55 samples) and CLM (Colombian in Medellin, Colombia; 60 samples); and the African populations YRI (Yoruba in Ibadan, Nigeria; 88 samples), LWK (Luhya in Webuye, Kenya; 97 samples) and ASW (African Ancestry in Southwest USA; 61 samples). This selection has been completed with AND, an Andalusian (south of Spain) population composed of 60 samples from healthy individuals, sequenced in the context of the Medical Genome Project [17], which can be considered as equivalent to IBS. AND data have been deposited at the European Genome-phenome Archive [25], which is hosted by the European Bioinformatics Institute, under accession number EGAS00001000324. All these populations together comprise a total of 1,152 individuals.

Human subjects

The whole genome sequences of the human populations described above (except AND) were downloaded from the 1000 Genomes Project web page [26] in multi-sample VCF format (October 2011 release). Variants in positions located in the miRNAs were collected for this study.

Following informed consent, the 60 AND samples were obtained and further anonymized and sequenced. Samples were obtained in accordance with the approved protocols of the respective institutional review boards for the protection of human subjects. The study conformed to the tenets of the declaration of Helsinki.

Construction of DNA libraries and sequencing

Library preparation and Exome capture were performed according to protocol version 2.1 from Baylor College of Medicine [27]. Briefly, 5 μg of input genomic DNA was sheared, end-repaired and ligated with SOLID-specific adaptors. A fragment size distribution ranging from 160 to 180 bp after shearing and 200 to 250 bp after adaptor ligation was verified by Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, California, USA). The library was amplified by pre-capture LM-PCR (linker mediated-PCR) using the FastStart High Fidelity PCR System (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). After purification, 2 μg of the LM-PCR product was hybridized to NimbleGen SeqCap EZ Exome libraries. After washing, amplification was performed by post-capture LM-PCR using the FastStart High Fidelity PCR System (Roche). Capture enrichment was measured by quantitative PCR according to the NimbleGen protocol.

The successfully captured DNA was measured by Quant-iT™ PicoGreen® dsDNA reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) and subjected to standard sample preparation procedures for sequencing with the SOLID 4 platform as recommended by the manufacturer. Briefly, emulsion PCR was performed on the E20 scale (about 250 million template beads) using a concentration of 0.343 pM of enriched captured DNA. After breaking and enrichment, about 128 million enriched template beads were sequenced per well on a four-well SOLID slide.

Analysis of sequencing data

The analysis was done using the pipeline of the Medical Genome Project. Briefly, sequence reads were aligned to the reference human genome build GRCh37 (hg19) by using the Burrows-Wheeler alignment (BFAST tool) [28]. Properly mapped reads were filtered with SAMtools [29], which was also used for sorting and indexing mapping files. Only high quality sequence reads with unique mapping positions to the reference human genome were used for calling variants. Identification of variants in the alignment files was performed using the Genome Analysis Toolkit [30]. Known SNPs were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information dbSNP build 135 [31] and the 1000 Genomes Project [26] (October 2011 release).

Characterization of variants across samples was performed by custom applications developed in Java. Each variant profile summarized zygosity, mean coverage, and mean alternative allele frequency across samples. The miRNA identifier and corresponding pre-mir substructure for each variant were obtained by matching variant location with pre-mir coordinates retrieved from miRBase [32].

miRNA variant analysis was performed by custom R [33] scripts. Computed features from analysis were: single nucleotide variant (SNV) frequency (per pre-mir and mature miRNA, per pre-mir substructure, and per subject), subject frequency (per variant and per pre-mir and mature miRNA), disease frequency (per pre-mir), and pre-mir frequency (per subject and disease).

Deviations from the Hardy-Weinberg proportions were tested with a χ2 test [34] as evidence for possible selection against the alternative allele homozygote. Principal component analysis was carried out using the Eigenstrat program [35]. Hive plots were obtained using the R package HiveR [36]. All clustering charts were created using the Heatmap command of R stats package [33].

Validation of selected variants in miRNA genes by PCR-based direct genomic sequencing

Peripheral blood samples were collected from all subjects for genomic DNA purification using an automated DNA extractor (MagNA Pure LC Instrument, Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). In order to validate the variations detected by next-generation sequencing, specific primers were designed using the Primer 3 Output program [37]. PCR conditions and primer sequences employed are available upon request. The amplified products were subsequently purified using an enzymatic procedure, according to the manufacturer's recommendations (EXOSAP-IT®, USB Corporation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA) and sequenced with a ready reaction kit (BigDye Terminator Cycle FS Ready Reaction kit; PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The fragments obtained were purified using fine columns (Sephadex G-501, Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, Missouri, USA) and resolved on an automated sequencer (3730 DNA Analyzer, Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, California, USA). Finally, the data were analyzed using Lasergene DNASTAR® software (DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, WI, USA).

Results and discussion

Variants found in miRNAs

The capture kit used in the exome enrichment (see Materials and methods) contains 720 miRNAs. In this study we have focused on these regions, as representative of the variability of the whole spectrum of human miRNAs. In the case of the 14 populations from the 1000 Genomes Project, the genomic variant files (VCF) were downloaded from the 1000 Genomes Project web site and mapped over the genomic positions of the 720 miRNAs. The variants corresponding to these regulatory elements were considered for the study. In the case of the newly sequenced Spanish samples, the sequencing reads were mapped onto the chromosomal coordinates of miRNAs and the variants were called as described in Materials and methods. The average coverage observed in these regions was satisfactory (approximately 40×) and the frequency of the alternative allele when the variant call was heterozygous was over 30% of the reads. These results ensured the quality of the variant calling process.

A total of 527 different sites located within the complete pre-miRNA structures of the 1,152 individuals analyzed were affected by SNVs. Table 1 summarizes the SNVs found in this study and Additional file 1 contains a comprehensive description of the variability map found in human miRNAs. Thirty-five percent of these SNVs were not present in dbSNP, indicating that massive sequencing still has considerable potential for variant discovery. Also among these SNVs, 45 affected the 5' and 3' seed regions and occurred in 44 different miRNAs. Sixty percent of these miRNAs (26) have previously been linked to diseases, according to the human miRNA disease databases [8, 24]. In the case of the 60 new Spanish individuals sequenced, 11 so far undescribed variants were found (Table 2) among the 92 SNVs detected. Almost all of them were unique variants. Two of them could not be validated (see Materials and methods) due to technical problems. Actually, hsa-mir-1324 validation was inconclusive because multiple bands appeared in the gel. When this miRNA was checked in miRBase, we found that it was withdrawn because of poor structure (entry MI0006655) but it was included again (entry MI0006657). This entry contains a note of caution because some additional sequences reported for this miRNA [38] did not meet miRBase requirements for miRNA identification. This could explain the difficulties found in its validation.

Table 1 Summary of variant positions found
Table 2 New variants found in the newly sequenced Spanish population (AND) arranged by chromosome location

While previous estimations of variability suggested that only about 10% of the miRNAs will be affected by polymorphisms [10], our study reports 44% have variants in the analyzed populations. Moreover, 17% contain variants in critical regions of the mature miRNA. Another possible comparison comes from the 1000 Genomes Project, which recently reported an unexpected amount of deleterious mutations in the coding genes of approximately 250 to 300 of these LOF variants per individual [15]. Considering 21,160 protein coding genes (according to Ensembl, human genome version GRCh37.p5), there is a ratio of 0.014 LOF variants per gene in the genome. If we consider those SNVs located in the seed regions as potentially functional variants, the equivalent resulting ratio would be 0.05 functional variants per miRNA, which is 3.5-fold higher than for protein coding regions. Despite the simplicity of this comparison, it reveals a scenario with a level of variability higher than previously expected.

The distribution of SNVs in the miRNAs across individuals in different populations is consistent with the known historical divergences among populations [39, 40]. Figure 2 shows a principal component analysis that clearly segregates the four main populations: African, European, Asian and American. Human population migrations is a well-known factor in the determination of current patterns of intra- and inter-population genetic diversity [41]. Figure 3 shows the distribution of SNVs per individual for the different geographical origins, derived from the analyzed populations. African populations, as expected, display the highest variability: 37.2 variants per individual mapping onto miRNAs, versus averages ranging between 24 and 29 in the other geographical origins.

Figure 2
figure 2

Principal component analysis based on the variability of the 14 populations from the 1000 Genomes Project and the Spanish sequenced population. Distances are based on a total of 198 different variant positions in which the sequenced Spanish population presented a reasonable coverage (>10×) and there was at least one variant in an individual. Colors are as follows: European populations in yellow; Asian populations in blue; African populations in purple and American populations in brown. PC, principal component.

Figure 3
figure 3

Distribution of the number of variants per individual in the different geographical origins derived from the populations analyzed. The populations used for the different geographical origins were: EUR (European), including TSI, FIN, GBR, CEU, IBS and AND; ASI (Asian), including CHB, CHS and JPT); AMR (American) (including MXL, PUR and CLM); and AFR (African), including YRI, LWK and ASW.

The distribution of variants among the different miRNAs is not uniform. While most of them were affected by only one SNV, 19 mature miRNAs are affected by 2 SNVs, among which are hsa-miR-302b*, associated with carcinoma, glioma, embryonal carcinoma and prostatic, thyroid and skin neoplasms, and hsa-miR-629, associated with liver, colonic and testicular neoplasms and lymphomas, according to the Human MicroRNA Disease database [8]. In addition, two mature miRNAs are affected by three SNVs, hsa-miR-323b-5p and hsa-miR-936, with no known association to any disease described to date. This observation indicates that multiple mutations rarely occur in miRNAs associated with diseases.

The variants were not homogeneously distributed across the structure of the pre-miRNA. Figure 1 (top) shows the distribution of the occurrence of variants along the different pre-miRNA substructures. As expected, the regions corresponding to the mature miRNA as well as the loop (see Figure 1 (bottom) for the description of the miRNA regions) displayed a lower occurrence of variants than the rest of the miR 5' and 3' regions. Table 3 contains a comprehensive description of all the SNVs located in the seed regions, putatively critical for the functionality of miRNA, which occurs by complementarity with their respective targets. A total of 45 SNVs were found in these critical regions, which comprise 8% of the total variants found.

Table 3 SNVs found in all the populations analysed affecting critical regions of miRNAs

Zygosity, allele frequencies and selective pressures

As expected, most of the variants found in the studied samples were heterozygotes (399 out of 527, approximately 75%). However, for one-fourth of the variants detected (128) the alternative allele was homozygous in at least one individual. Also according to the expectations, allele population frequencies were low for most SNVs. Figure 4 shows the distribution of variants according to their allele frequency estimated from the populations used in this study.

Figure 4
figure 4

Number of variant positions with different allelic frequencies. Distribution of SNVs according to their relative allelic frequencies.

A classical way to verify the existence of variants under negative selection (and, consequently, probably pathogenicity) is to check for deviations from HWE [34]. HWE states that, given a series of assumptions, both allele and genotype frequencies in a population remain constant (in equilibrium) with time unless specific disturbing influences are introduced. Deviations from this equilibrium can be tested with a conventional chi-square test. Selective pressures against one of the alleles are one of the most common factors that can produce this deviation. Table 4 shows 41 SNVs belonging to all the populations analyzed that were significantly deviated from the HWE. Actually, the real number might be higher because the small sizes of the populations available for the study (around or below 100 individuals) preclude the possibility of obtaining lower P-values even for highly deviated proportions.

Table 4 Variant positions with significant deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium

Again, comparisons to the number of LOF variants in coding genes can be done if SNVs significantly deviated from HWE are considered as potentially functional. In this case, the resulting ratio would be 0.08 functional variants per variant miRNA. This value is 5.5-fold higher than the ratio of LOF variants observed in protein coding regions.

Diseases associated with miRNAs with variants and potential consequences

The process of human migrations in the past has played a key role in determining current patterns of genetic diversity and could partially explain inter-population variations in genetic susceptibility to certain diseases [41, 42]. As previously discussed, variants affecting essential regions of the miRNAs, such as the seed or the loop, have a high probability of having consequences on miRNA functionality. Moreover, it has been described that variants affecting other regions of the miRNA structure can also adversely effect its functionality [9]. Given that miRNAs target many different mRNA sequences, SNVs affecting them are expected to cause considerable pleiotropic effects. Moreover, given that the mode of action of miRNAs implies interference of the mRNAs of their target genes with consequent inhibition of the corresponding gene product, a dominant or codominant (having incomplete penetrance) effect would be expected from a variant that affects an miRNA's functionality. Additional file 2 lists the diseases in which different miRNAs with variants in the studied population have been reported to be involved, according the PhenomiR human miRNA disease database [24].

Among the 527 variants found in this work, 45 affected the recognition region of the corresponding miRNA and were found in 43 different miRNAs, 26 of which are known to be involved in 57 diseases. Many of these diseases are cancers, probably because the studies are quite recent and have been carried out mainly from this perspective. However, many miRNAs are involved in other diseases of different etiologies; the fact that a considerable number of them have been associated with more than one disease highlights the pleiotropic effect of miRNAs. This pleitropic effect makes it difficult to understand the relationships between mutations and the possible effects in cases of miRNAs associated with diseases. Figure 5a shows the similarity between populations in terms of shared variants at each position of the miRNA precursor compared. Obviously, intra-population similarities are higher than inter-population similarities. Populations from a common geographical region display higher similarities than when they are compared to populations of other geographical origins. Overall, the resulting clustering obtained for the populations reflects their historic origins, as expected [41]. However, when only positions mapping in the seed regions of the miRNA are considered in the comparison, several populations share more common SNVs with other populations of different geographical origins (Figure 5b) than with neighbor populations. For example, some African, European and American populations seem to be more similar to each other than to other populations with closer geographic origins. This can be explained by the limited repertoire of mutations that can be tolerated in regions critical for miRNA functionality. This population intermingling effect is still more noticeable when the distribution of diseases across populations is visualized (Figure 5c). In this case, the effect is a combination of two factors: on one hand the limited number of miRNAs affected in the critical regions and, on the other, the pleiotropic effect of such miRNAs, which causes a non-proportional distribution of the diseases. As expected, Africans, due to their higher variability levels, cover a wider range of potential diseases. However, the number of diseases is not directly proportional to the general variability levels of the population and depends on the particular repertoire of miRNAs affected. The interrelationships between diseases, populations and miRNAs can be represented by means of a hive plot. Figure 5d shows such relationships, with the diseases summarized in general categories. A complex correspondence between miRNAs and the respective diseases caused is evident. Almost all the miRNAs appear mutated in almost all the populations and the same can be said for the diseases. However, Figure 5a shows some population trends in the diseases, probably due to founder effects.

Figure 5
figure 5

Relationships between miRNAs, diseases in which they are involved and populations. Heat maps were produced using an agglomerative clustering algorithm with Euclidean distances. (a) Heat map portraying the similarity between populations in terms of shared variants at each position of the miRNA precursor compared. The color code represents the number of common variants between population pairs. (b) Heat map of similarity between populations when only those positions mapping in the seed regions of the miRNAs are considered in the comparison. The color code represents the number of common variants between population pairs with the analysis restricted to variants mapping in the seed regions. (c) Heat map of the distribution of diseases across populations. The color code represents the number of variants per population associated with each disease category. (d) Hive plot showing the relationships between miRNAs, populations and diseases, with the diseases summarized in general categories.

Putative functional impact

Defective miRNAs cause diseases because of their inability to silence the corresponding natural set of target genes (and eventually by silencing new target genes). Since miRNAs have multiple targets, it is expected that they have a collective action over cell functionalities. Indeed, cases of miRNAs acting on genes involved in particular functional processes have been described [4345]. In order to understand the possible impact of the corresponding population mutational load, we have listed the genes targeted by the 45 different miRNAs with SNVs in their seed regions and selected the KEGG pathways [46] containing genes on this list. A total of 34 (of a total of 51) KEGG pathway categories contained genes targeted by the 45 miRNAs with seed regions affected by SNVs. Figure 6a shows the distribution of putatively affected pathways across populations. Despite the large number of targets affected by the miRNAs, 17 categories are untargeted by any miRNA, all of which are related to basic metabolism, replication, transcription, repair and other basic cellular functions. Actually, several metabolism categories (for example, energy metabolism, metabolism of terpeniods and polyketides, biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites) are among the less affected categories across all the populations. On the other side of the spectrum, pathway categories related to cancer, immune system, cardiovascular diseases and diverse forms of signaling are among the most affected ones. This observation is in accordance with the diseases to which the miRNAs affected have been linked. Again, the patterns of distribution of diseases for African populations are less homogeneous than those of other populations. For example, in LWK populations pathways of neurodegenerative diseases and immune system seem to be less affected than in the other two African populations (YRI and ASW). There are also some interesting distributions of patterns. For example, for some populations of different origins (LKW, GBR and JPT), pathways related to neurodegenerative diseases seem to be less affected than other categories. As in the case of diseases, the relationships among miRNAs, pathway categories and populations are complex, as represented in Figure 6b.

Figure 6
figure 6

Relationships between miRNAs, pathway categories and populations. (a) Heat map of the distribution of pathway categories across populations. Color code represents the percentage of pathways potentially altered within any of the categories. A pathway is considered to be affected if one of its genes is targeted by any miRNA with variants in the seed region. (d) Hive plot showing the relationships between miRNAs, populations and pathway categories.


An increasing amount of evidence accumulated during the past few years firmly links miRNAs to numerous diseases [8, 4749]. Moreover, non-coding RNAs have been proposed as therapeutic agents given their silencing capabilities [50]. Therefore, detailed knowledge on natural variation in miRNAs is needed to discriminate pathological variants from those present in healthy populations [51, 52].

The use of a reasonably large sample of 1,152 individuals from 15 different populations from 4 geographical origins allowed us to compile a quite comprehensive catalogue of natural variation in miRNAs. This regulatory element is expected to be under strong negative selection and, consequently, highly conserved [10]. However, our results document an unexpected amount of variability, comparable (actually higher) to what was recently described for coding regions [15].

Although it is difficult to properly judge the real role of this variability, some observations would suggest that, most likely, a functional impact cannot be ruled out. Firstly, the occurrence of SNVs across the complete pre-miRNA structure (Figure 1) is consistent with the relative importance of the distinct miRNA regions to functionality. Obviously, the seed sequence is crucial for miRNA functionality, but other regions, such as those next to the seed, have also recently been involved in miRNA functionality [9]. In the seed regions alone, 45 SNVs disrupt the recognition site of the miRNA for its targets. In addition, as expected, heterozygotic variants are more abundant than the alternative allele homozygotic variants (75.7% versus 24.3%). Moreover, many of the variants found are low-frequency, rare variants or even variants specific to individuals. Obviously, approaches based on rare variants to infer functional impact [53] consider low frequency as a necessary but not sufficient condition to justify the existence of a selective pressure against such variants. On the other hand, selective pressures can also be inferred by deviations from HWE [34], which occurs for 41 of these variants.

Although it is impossible to discard the possibility that any of the healthy controls used in this study will develop some pathology in the future, it is unlikely that this occurs for a significant number of them. Therefore, the apparent neutral effect of potentially deleterious SNVs found in this study might be either a consequence of a recessive effect in functionality or due to the fact that they are neutral changes (despite the fact that they disrupt regions apparently essential for miRNA functionality).

It is likely that that many of the variants discovered that affect essential miRNA regions do have a recessive effect. Then, the probability of generation of homozygosis by random crossing is non-negligible given the allelic frequencies. This fact would also suggest that the role of miRNAs in disease could be stronger than previously suspected. In any case, the role of such recently discovered variability in shaping the phenotype or in the occurrence of diseases is still unclear and deserves further study.



base pair


Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium


loss of function




polymerase chain reaction


single nucleotide polymorphism


single nucleotide variant.


  1. Kim VN: MicroRNA biogenesis: coordinated cropping and dicing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005, 6: 376-385.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lim LP, Lau NC, Garrett-Engele P, Grimson A, Schelter JM, Castle J, Bartel DP, Linsley PS, Johnson JM: Microarray analysis shows that some microRNAs downregulate large numbers of target mRNAs. Nature. 2005, 433: 769-773. 10.1038/nature03315.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Selbach M, Schwanhausser B, Thierfelder N, Fang Z, Khanin R, Rajewsky N: Widespread changes in protein synthesis induced by microRNAs. Nature. 2008, 455: 58-63. 10.1038/nature07228.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Griffiths-Jones S, Grocock RJ, van Dongen S, Bateman A, Enright AJ: miRBase: microRNA sequences, targets and gene nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: D140-144. 10.1093/nar/gkj112.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bartel DP: MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004, 116: 281-297. 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ambros V: The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature. 2004, 431: 350-355. 10.1038/nature02871.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kloosterman WP, Plasterk RH: The diverse functions of microRNAs in animal development and disease. Dev Cell. 2006, 11: 441-450. 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.09.009.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lu M, Zhang Q, Deng M, Miao J, Guo Y, Gao W, Cui Q: An analysis of human microRNA and disease associations. PLoS ONE. 2008, 3: e3420-10.1371/journal.pone.0003420.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun G, Yan J, Noltner K, Feng J, Li H, Sarkis DA, Sommer SS, Rossi JJ: SNPs in human miRNA genes affect biogenesis and function. RNA. 2009, 15: 1640-1651. 10.1261/rna.1560209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Saunders MA, Liang H, Li WH: Human polymorphism at microRNAs and microRNA target sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104: 3300-3305. 10.1073/pnas.0611347104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu Z, Liang J, Wang Z, Tian T, Zhou X, Chen J, Miao R, Wang Y, Wang X, Shen H: Common genetic variants in pre-microRNAs were associated with increased risk of breast cancer in Chinese women. Hum Mutat. 2009, 30: 79-84. 10.1002/humu.20837.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Srivastava K, Srivastava A, Mittal B: Common genetic variants in pre-microRNAs and risk of gallbladder cancer in North Indian population. J Hum Genet. 2010, 55: 495-499. 10.1038/jhg.2010.54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Okubo M, Tahara T, Shibata T, Yamashita H, Nakamura M, Yoshioka D, Yonemura J, Kamiya Y, Ishizuka T, Nakagawa Y, Nagasaka M, Iwata M, Yamada H, Hirata I, Arisawa T: Association study of common genetic variants in pre-microRNAs in patients with ulcerative colitis. J Clin Immunol. 2011, 31: 69-73. 10.1007/s10875-010-9461-y.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen K, Rajewsky N: Natural selection on human microRNA binding sites inferred from SNP data. Nat Genet. 2006, 38: 1452-1456. 10.1038/ng1910.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium: A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature. 2010, 467: 1061-1073. 10.1038/nature09534.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. MacArthur DG, Tyler-Smith C: Loss-of-function variants in the genomes of healthy humans. Hum Mol Genet. 2010, 19: R125-130. 10.1093/hmg/ddq365.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. The Medical Genome Project. []

  18. Saccone SF, Quan J, Mehta G, Bolze R, Thomas P, Deelman E, Tischfield JA, Rice JP: New tools and methods for direct programmatic access to the dbSNP relational database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39: D901-907. 10.1093/nar/gkq1054.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lewis BP, Burge CB, Bartel DP: Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell. 2005, 120: 15-20. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.035.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lewis BP, Shih IH, Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP, Burge CB: Prediction of mammalian microRNA targets. Cell. 2003, 115: 787-798. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)01018-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ellwanger DC, Buttner FA, Mewes HW, Stumpflen V: The sufficient minimal set of miRNA seed types. Bioinformatics. 2011, 27: 1346-1350. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr149.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Min H, Yoon S: Got target? Computational methods for microRNA target prediction and their extension. Exp Mol Med. 2010, 42: 233-244. 10.3858/emm.2010.42.4.032.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Bartel DP: MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009, 136: 215-233. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ruepp A, Kowarsch A, Theis F: PhenomiR: microRNAs in human diseases and biological processes. Methods Mol Biol. 2012, 822: 249-260. 10.1007/978-1-61779-427-8_17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. The European Genome-phenome Archive EGA. []

  26. The 1000 Genomes Project. []

  27. Baylor College of Medicine: Library Preparation and Exome Capture Protocol Version 2.1. []

  28. Homer N, Merriman B, Nelson SF: BFAST: an alignment tool for large scale genome resequencing. PLoS ONE. 2009, 4: e7767-10.1371/journal.pone.0007767.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R: The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25: 2078-2079. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M, DePristo MA: The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010, 20: 1297-1303. 10.1101/gr.107524.110.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sherry ST, Ward MH, Kholodov M, Baker J, Phan L, Smigielski EM, Sirotkin K: dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29: 308-311. 10.1093/nar/29.1.308.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. miRBase. []

  33. The R Project for Statistical Computing. []

  34. Wigginton JE, Cutler DJ, Abecasis GR: A note on exact tests of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Am J Hum Genet. 2005, 76: 887-893. 10.1086/429864.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D: Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006, 38: 904-909. 10.1038/ng1847.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. HiveR: 2D and 3D Hive Plots for R. []

  37. Primer 3. []

  38. Afanasyeva EA, Hotz-Wagenblatt A, Glatting KH, Westermann F: New miRNAs cloned from neuroblastoma. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 52-10.1186/1471-2164-9-52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Sved JA, McRae AF, Visscher PM: Divergence between human populations estimated from linkage disequilibrium. Am J Hum Genet. 2008, 83: 737-743. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.10.019.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. McEvoy BP, Powell JE, Goddard ME, Visscher PM: Human population dispersal "Out of Africa" estimated from linkage disequilibrium and allele frequencies of SNPs. Genome Res. 2011, 21: 821-829. 10.1101/gr.119636.110.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Novembre J, Di Rienzo A: Spatial patterns of variation due to natural selection in humans. Nat Rev Genet. 2009, 10: 745-755. 10.1038/nrg2632.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Tishkoff SA, Verrelli BC: Patterns of human genetic diversity: implications for human evolutionary history and disease. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2003, 4: 293-340. 10.1146/annurev.genom.4.070802.110226.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Abbott AL, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Miska EA, Lau NC, Bartel DP, Horvitz HR, Ambros V: The let-7 MicroRNA family members mir-48, mir-84, and mir-241 function together to regulate developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Cell. 2005, 9: 403-414. 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.07.009.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Korpal M, Lee ES, Hu G, Kang Y: The miR-200 family inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer cell migration by direct targeting of E-cadherin transcriptional repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283: 14910-14914. 10.1074/jbc.C800074200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Linsley PS, Schelter J, Burchard J, Kibukawa M, Martin MM, Bartz SR, Johnson JM, Cummins JM, Raymond CK, Dai H, Chau N, Cleary M, Jackson AL, Carleton M, Lim L: Transcripts targeted by the microRNA-16 family cooperatively regulate cell cycle progression. Mol Cell Biol. 2007, 27: 2240-2252. 10.1128/MCB.02005-06.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Sato Y, Furumichi M, Tanabe M: KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40: D109-114. 10.1093/nar/gkr988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Croce CM: Causes and consequences of microRNA dysregulation in cancer. Nat Rev Genet. 2009, 10: 704-714. 10.1038/nrg2634.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Hebert SS, De Strooper B: Alterations of the microRNA network cause neurodegenerative disease. Trends Neurosci. 2009, 32: 199-206. 10.1016/j.tins.2008.12.003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Pauley KM, Cha S, Chan EK: MicroRNA in autoimmunity and autoimmune diseases. J Autoimmun. 2009, 32: 189-194. 10.1016/j.jaut.2009.02.012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Galasso M, Elena Sana M, Volinia S: Non-coding RNAs: a key to future personalized molecular therapy?. Genome Med. 2010, 2: 12-10.1186/gm133.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Majewski J, Schwartzentruber J, Lalonde E, Montpetit A, Jabado N: What can exome sequencing do for you?. J Med Genet. 2011, 48: 580-589. 10.1136/jmedgenet-2011-100223.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Bamshad MJ, Ng SB, Bigham AW, Tabor HK, Emond MJ, Nickerson DA, Shendure J: Exome sequencing as a tool for Mendelian disease gene discovery. Nat Rev Genet. 2011, 12: 745-755. 10.1038/nrg3031.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Gibson G: Rare and common variants: twenty arguments. Nat Rev Genet. 2011, 13: 135-145.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


The Medical Genome Project is an initiative of the Consejería de Salud de la Junta de Andalucía and was supported by the "Programa Nacional de Proyectos de investigación Aplicada", I+D+i 2008, "Subprograma de actuaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas en Parques Científicos y Tecnológicos (ACTEPARQ 2009) and FEDER. This work is also partly supported by grants from projects BIO2008-04212 and BIO2011-27069 from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, PI1001290 from the Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria, and PROMETEO/2010/001 from the GVA-FEDER. The CIBER de Enfermedades Raras is an initiative of the ISCIII. The RTICC is an initiative of the ISCIII. This work is also partly supported by a grant (RD06/0020/1019) from Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa en Cáncer (RTICC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. EA is supported by a fellowship from the FIS of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (FI06/00027).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guillermo Antiñolo or Joaquín Dopazo.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Authors' contributions

JC performed the sequence analysis, helped by EA, PA, JS and IM; SB and MR selected and phenotyped the samples used. The sequencing of the Spanish samples was carried out by AV. The work was coordinated by JD, SSB and GA. JD conceived the work and wrote the manuscript with GA. All authors have read and approved the manuscript for publication.

Electronic supplementary material


Additional file 1: Variant positions found. Excel file containing a comprehensive list of the 527 variant positions found in the study. (XLS 133 KB)


Additional file 2: Diseases in which miRNAs with variant positions have been involved. Excel file containing a comprehensive list of diseases in which miRNAs with their seed regions affected by SNVs have been involved, according to the human microRNA disease database. (XLS 57 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carbonell, J., Alloza, E., Arce, P. et al. A map of human microRNA variation uncovers unexpectedly high levels of variability. Genome Med 4, 62 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: